• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估不稳定严重指数评分在预测活跃军人人群行关节镜下 Bankart 手术后失败的应用。

Evaluation of the Instability Severity Index score in predicting failure following arthroscopic Bankart surgery in an active military population.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):e156-e163. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.048. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.048
PMID:30685274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Instability Severity Index (ISI) score is a preoperative risk stratification tool used to identify patients at heightened risk of recurrent anterior instability after an arthroscopic Bankart procedure. The primary objective of this study was to validate the utility of the ISI score in predicting failure of primary arthroscopic Bankart surgery in an active-duty military population.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to compare all military service members undergoing primary arthroscopic Bankart repairs at a single military treatment facility between 2007 and 2014. The primary outcome of interest was surgical failure due to recurrent instability. The ISI framework was used to stratify each patient for recurrence, and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the composite ISI score and individual domains between patients with and patients without failed Bankart repairs.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were identified, with a mean patient age of 26.8 years (range, 19-47 years), among whom 42 patients (32%) were identified as having a higher-demand military occupation. At a minimum 2-year follow-up, 34 patients (26%) sustained recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The mean ISI score of patients in the failed Bankart repair group was not statistically different than that of patients with a successful repair (3.41 vs 3.5, P = .74), and no individual ISI domains were identified as independent risk factors for subsequent surgical failure or revision stabilization.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the findings of previous validation studies, the composite ISI score and its individual risk factors were not predictive of subsequent surgical failure after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair in an active military population.

摘要

背景

不稳定严重程度指数(ISI)评分是一种术前风险分层工具,用于识别关节镜下 Bankart 手术后复发性前不稳定风险增加的患者。本研究的主要目的是验证 ISI 评分在预测现役军人关节镜下 Bankart 初次修复手术失败中的作用。

方法

对 2007 年至 2014 年期间在一家军事医疗机构接受初次关节镜 Bankart 修复术的所有现役军人进行回顾性研究。主要研究结果为因复发性不稳定导致手术失败。使用 ISI 框架对每位患者进行复发分层,并进行多变量分析,以评估复合 ISI 评分和个体领域在 Bankart 修复失败和未失败患者之间的差异。

结果

共确定了 131 名患者,平均年龄 26.8 岁(范围,19-47 岁),其中 42 名(32%)患者从事高需求的军事职业。在至少 2 年的随访中,34 名(26%)患者出现复发性前肩不稳定。Bankart 修复失败组的 ISI 评分平均值与修复成功组无统计学差异(3.41 对 3.5,P = .74),且没有任何个体 ISI 领域被确定为随后手术失败或翻修稳定的独立危险因素。

结论

与先前验证研究的结果相反,在现役军人中,复合 ISI 评分及其各个危险因素并不能预测初次关节镜 Bankart 修复后的手术失败。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Instability Severity Index score in predicting failure following arthroscopic Bankart surgery in an active military population.评估不稳定严重指数评分在预测活跃军人人群行关节镜下 Bankart 手术后失败的应用。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):e156-e163. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.048. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
2
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport.关节镜下Bankart修复术与开放Bristow-Latarjet手术治疗肩关节不稳的比较:一项聚焦于恢复运动的配对多中心研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205. doi: 10.1177/0363546516658037. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Instability Severity Index Score predicts recurrent shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair.不稳定严重程度指数评分可预测关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发性肩关节不稳定。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Aug;32(8):2152-2160. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12235. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
A lower Instability Severity Index score threshold may better predict recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review.下不稳定严重程度指数评分阈值可能更好地预测关节镜下 Bankart 修复后复发性前肩不稳定:系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2021 Sep;6(5):295-301. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000584. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Previous arthroscopic Bankart repair is an independent risk factor for an inferior outcome after Latarjet procedure.先前的关节镜下 Bankart 修复术是 Latarjet 手术后预后不良的独立危险因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8):1481-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
6
Risk factors for recurrent instability or revision surgery following arthroscopic Bankart repair.关节镜下Bankart修复术后复发性不稳定或翻修手术的危险因素。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Mar 1;100-B(3):324-330. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0557.R1.
7
The Hill-Sachs interval to glenoid track width ratio is comparable to the instability severity index score for predicting risk of recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair.Hill-Sachs 间隔与关节盂轨迹宽度比可用于预测关节镜下 Bankart 修复后复发性不稳定的风险,与不稳定严重指数评分相当。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jan;29(1):250-256. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05955-0. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Editorial Commentary: Which Patients Are Likely to Undergo Redislocation After an Arthroscopic Bankart Repair? Preoperative Instability Severity Index Scoring Over 3 Points-The Game Is Over!述评:哪些患者在接受关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后可能会再次脱位?术前不稳定严重程度指数评分超过 3 分——游戏结束!
Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):367-371. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.028.
9
Long-term Results of the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Older Than 40 Years: A Comparison With the Open Latarjet Procedure.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术治疗 40 岁以上复发性肩关节前向不稳定患者的长期疗效:与开放 Latarjet 手术的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2090-2096. doi: 10.1177/0363546520931090. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
10
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet as a Revision Surgery After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.关节镜下 Latarjet 术作为初次关节镜 Bankart 修复失败后的翻修手术的疗效。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jan;52(1):190-200. doi: 10.1177/03635465231209986.

引用本文的文献

1
Single anterior shoulder dislocation patients demonstrate higher rates of posterior labral repair and biceps procedures than multiple dislocators at the time of arthroscopic stabilization surgery.在关节镜稳定手术时,单次前肩脱位患者比多次脱位患者表现出更高的后盂唇修复率和肱二头肌手术率。
JSES Int. 2024 Jul 3;8(5):978-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.008. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Glenoid augmentation for subcritical bone loss: a narrative review.用于亚临界骨量丢失的关节盂增强术:一项叙述性综述
Ann Jt. 2024 Apr 9;9:15. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-36. eCollection 2024.
3
What keeps a shoulder stable - Is there an ideal method for anterior stabilisation?
是什么维持肩部稳定——是否存在理想的前路稳定方法?
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Feb;16(1):4-7. doi: 10.1177/17585732231224699. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Anterior Shoulder Instability and Open Procedures: History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes.前肩不稳和开放性手术:历史、适应证和临床结果。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(4):521-533. doi: 10.4055/cios23018. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
In-Season Management of Shoulder Instability: How to Evaluate, Treat, and Safely Return to Sport.赛季中肩部不稳定的管理:如何评估、治疗并安全重返运动
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023 Jul;16(7):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09838-y. Epub 2023 May 17.
6
Anteroinferior Glenoid Rim Fractures Are a Relatively Common Finding in Shoulder Instability Patients Aged 50 Years or Older but May Not Portend a Worse Prognosis.肩胛盂前下缘骨折在50岁及以上的肩关节不稳定患者中是相对常见的表现,但可能并不预示着更差的预后。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep 8;4(5):e1813-e1819. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.07.012. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
There is No Difference in Return to Duty Following the Latarjet With Subscapularis Split Versus Tenotomy Technique in the Military Population.在军事人群中,肩胛下肌劈开与肌腱切断技术的Latarjet手术后重返工作岗位情况无差异。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 25;4(4):e1445-e1448. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.035. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Sex-specific differences in outcomes after anterior shoulder surgical stabilization: a meta-analysis and systematic review of literature.前肩手术稳定术后结果的性别差异:一项荟萃分析和文献系统综述
JSES Int. 2021 Nov 20;6(1):123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.10.002. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Open Stabilization Procedures of the Shoulder in the Athlete: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.运动员肩部开放稳定手术:适应症、技术及结果
Open Access J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 2;12:159-169. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S321883. eCollection 2021.
10
Age, participation in competitive sports, bony lesions, ALPSA lesions, > 1 preoperative dislocations, surgical delay and ISIS score > 3 are risk factors for recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4584 shoulders.年龄、参与竞技体育、骨损伤、ALPSA 损伤、术前脱位次数>1、手术延迟和 ISIS 评分>3 是关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后复发的危险因素:4584 例肩关节的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Dec;29(12):4004-4014. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06704-7. Epub 2021 Aug 22.