Suppr超能文献

四腔心切面与右心室焦点切面在右心室大小和功能定量评估中的比较。

Comparison Between Four-Chamber and Right Ventricular-Focused Views for the Quantitative Evaluation of Right Ventricular Size and Function.

机构信息

University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Apr;32(4):484-494. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.11.014. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) function plays a pivotal prognostic role in multiple cardiac diseases. Echocardiography guidelines recommend that RV quantification be performed in the RV-focused view, which is theoretically more reproducible than the four-chamber (4Ch) view. However, differences between views in RV size and function measurements have never been systematically studied. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare (1) RV size and function parameters obtained from the RV-focused and 4Ch views and (2) test-retest variability between these two views.

METHODS

Fifty patients (26 men; mean age, 63 ± 18 years) undergoing clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiography were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent three repeated acquisitions of the 4Ch and RV-focused views by two sonographers. The first operator performed two acquisitions at the beginning and the end of the clinical transthoracic echocardiographic study, and the second operator performed the third acquisition afterward. RV size and function measurements were obtained from the two views and compared using paired t-test analysis and Bland-Altman analysis. Intra- and interoperator test-retest and intra- and interreader variability for both views were assessed using intraclass correlations and coefficients of variation.

RESULTS

All RV size parameters were significantly larger when measured in the RV-focused view compared with the 4Ch view. Also, all RV function parameters, including RV free wall and global longitudinal strain, were larger in magnitude when measured in the RV-focused view. Measurements variability was consistently better for the RV-focused view.

CONCLUSIONS

RV size and function measurements obtained from the RV-focused and 4Ch views are not interchangeable. RV size and function parameters measured from the RV-focused view are more reproducible than from 4Ch acquisitions. Therefore, only the RV-focused view should be used for quantitative assessment of the right ventricle.

摘要

背景

右心室(RV)功能在多种心脏疾病中起着关键的预后作用。超声心动图指南建议在 RV 焦点视图中进行 RV 定量,理论上比四腔(4Ch)视图更具可重复性。然而,RV 大小和功能测量的视图之间的差异从未被系统研究过。因此,本研究的目的是比较(1)从 RV 焦点视图和 4Ch 视图获得的 RV 大小和功能参数,以及(2)这两个视图之间的测试-再测试可变性。

方法

前瞻性纳入 50 名接受临床指征经胸超声心动图检查的患者(26 名男性;平均年龄 63±18 岁)。每位患者由两名超声医师进行三次 4Ch 和 RV 焦点视图的重复采集。第一位操作者在临床经胸超声心动图研究的开始和结束时进行两次采集,第二位操作者随后进行第三次采集。从两个视图获取 RV 大小和功能测量值,并使用配对 t 检验分析和 Bland-Altman 分析进行比较。使用组内相关系数和变异系数评估两个视图的内-和间操作员测试-再测试以及内-和间读者变异性。

结果

与 4Ch 视图相比,从 RV 焦点视图测量的所有 RV 大小参数均显著更大。此外,当从 RV 焦点视图测量时,所有 RV 功能参数,包括 RV 游离壁和整体纵向应变,幅度均更大。测量变异性始终更适合 RV 焦点视图。

结论

从 RV 焦点视图和 4Ch 视图获得的 RV 大小和功能测量值不可互换。从 RV 焦点视图测量的 RV 大小和功能参数比从 4Ch 采集更具可重复性。因此,只有 RV 焦点视图应用于 RV 的定量评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验