Hirabayashi Ryo, Edama Mutsuaki, Kojima Sho, Nakamura Masatoshi, Ito Wataru, Nakamura Emi, Kikumoto Takanori, Onishi Hideaki
Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jan 11;12:527. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00527. eCollection 2018.
Excessive co-contraction interferes with smooth joint movement. One mechanism is the failure of reciprocal inhibition against antagonists during joint movement. Reciprocal inhibition has been investigated using joint torque as an index of intensity during co-contraction. However, contraction intensity as an index of co-contraction intensity has not been investigated. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of changes in contraction intensity during co-contraction on reciprocal inhibition. We established eight stimulus conditions in 20 healthy adult males to investigate the influence of changes in contraction intensity during co-contraction on reciprocal inhibition. These stimulus conditions comprised a conditioning stimulus-test stimulation interval (C-T interval) of -2, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 ms plus a test stimulus without a conditioning stimulus (single). Co-contraction of the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles at the same as contraction intensity was examined at rest and at 5, 15, and 30% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). At 5 and 15% MVC in the co-contraction task, the H-reflex amplitude was significantly decreased compared with single stimulation at a 2-ms C-T interval. At 30% MVC, there was no significant difference compared with single stimulation at a 2-ms C-T interval. At a 5-ms C-T interval, the H-reflex amplitude at 30% MVC was significantly reduced compared with that at rest. The findings indicated that during co-contraction, reciprocal Ia inhibition worked at 5 and 15% MVC. Contrary inhibition of reciprocal Ia inhibition did not apparently work at 30% MVC, and presynaptic inhibition (D1 inhibition) might work.
过度的共同收缩会干扰关节的顺畅运动。一种机制是在关节运动期间对拮抗肌的交互抑制失效。在共同收缩过程中,已经使用关节扭矩作为强度指标来研究交互抑制。然而,尚未研究以收缩强度作为共同收缩强度指标的情况。在本研究中,我们旨在评估共同收缩期间收缩强度变化对交互抑制的影响。我们在20名健康成年男性中建立了八种刺激条件,以研究共同收缩期间收缩强度变化对交互抑制的影响。这些刺激条件包括条件刺激 - 测试刺激间隔(C - T间隔)为 -2、0、1、2、3、4或5毫秒,再加上无条件刺激的测试刺激(单次)。在静息状态以及最大自主收缩(MVC)的5%、15%和30%时,检查胫骨前肌和比目鱼肌在相同收缩强度下的共同收缩情况。在共同收缩任务中,当C - T间隔为2毫秒时,与单次刺激相比,在MVC的5%和15%时,Hoffmann反射(H反射)幅度显著降低。在MVC的30%时,与C - T间隔为2毫秒的单次刺激相比,没有显著差异。在C - T间隔为5毫秒时,与静息状态相比,MVC的30%时H反射幅度显著降低。研究结果表明,在共同收缩期间,交互Ia抑制在MVC的5%和15%时起作用。在MVC的30%时,交互Ia抑制的反向抑制显然不起作用,可能是突触前抑制(D1抑制)起作用。