Manuweera Thushini, Yarossi Mathew, Adamovich Sergei, Tunik Eugene
Rutgers School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jan 9;12:531. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00531. eCollection 2018.
Current research shows promise in restoring impaired hand function after stroke with the help of Mirror Visual Feedback (MVF), putatively by facilitating activation of sensorimotor areas of the brain ipsilateral to the moving limb. However, the MVF related clinical effects show variability across studies. MVF tasks that have been used place varying amounts of visuomotor demand on one's ability to complete the task. Therefore, we ask here whether varying visuomotor demand during MVF may translate to differences in brain activation patterns. If so, we argue that this may provide a mechanistic explanation for variable clinical effects. To address this, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the interaction of target directed movement and MVF on the activation of, and functional connectivity between, regions within the visuomotor network. In an event-related fMRI design, twenty healthy subjects performed finger flexion movements using their dominant right hand, with feedback presented in a virtual reality (VR) environment. Visual feedback was presented in real time VR as either veridical feedback with and without a target (VT+ and VT-, respectively), or MVF with and without a target (MT+ and MT-, respectively). fMRI contrasts revealed predominantly activation in the ipsilateral intraparietal sulcus for the main effect of MVF and bilateral superior parietal activation for the main effect of target. Importantly, we noted significant and robust activation lateralized to the ipsilateral parietal cortex alone in the MT+ contrast with respect to the other conditions. This suggests that combining MVF with targeted movements performed using the right hand may redirect enhanced bilateral parietal activation due to target presentation to the ipsilateral cortex. Moreover, functional connectivity analysis revealed that the interaction between the ipsilateral parietal lobe and the motor cortex was significantly greater during target-directed movements with mirror feedback compared to veridical feedback. These findings provide a normative basis to investigate the integrity of these networks in patient populations. Identification of the brain regions involved in target directed movement with MVF in stroke may have important implications for optimal delivery of MVF based therapy.
当前研究表明,借助镜像视觉反馈(MVF)有望恢复中风后受损的手部功能,据推测这是通过促进与运动肢体同侧的大脑感觉运动区域的激活来实现的。然而,MVF相关的临床效果在不同研究中存在差异。已使用的MVF任务对完成任务的视觉运动能力有不同程度的要求。因此,我们在此探讨MVF期间视觉运动需求的变化是否会转化为大脑激活模式的差异。如果是这样,我们认为这可能为临床效果的差异提供一个机制性解释。为了解决这个问题,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来研究目标导向运动与MVF对视觉运动网络内区域的激活及其功能连接的相互作用。在一项事件相关的fMRI设计中,20名健康受试者用其优势右手进行手指弯曲运动,并在虚拟现实(VR)环境中呈现反馈。视觉反馈在实时VR中呈现为有目标和无目标的真实反馈(分别为VT+和VT-),或有目标和无目标的MVF(分别为MT+和MT-)。fMRI对比显示,MVF的主要效应主要激活同侧顶内沟,目标的主要效应激活双侧顶上叶。重要的是,相对于其他条件,我们注意到在MT+对比中,仅同侧顶叶皮层有显著且强烈的激活。这表明将MVF与使用右手进行的目标导向运动相结合,可能会将由于目标呈现而增强的双侧顶叶激活重定向到同侧皮层。此外,功能连接分析显示,与真实反馈相比,在有镜像反馈的目标导向运动期间,同侧顶叶与运动皮层之间的相互作用显著更大。这些发现为研究患者群体中这些网络的完整性提供了一个规范基础。确定中风患者中参与MVF目标导向运动的脑区可能对基于MVF的治疗的最佳实施具有重要意义。