Pack Quinn R, Woodbury Erin A, Headley Samuel, Visintainer Paul, Engelman Richard, Miller Amanda, Riley Hayden, Lagu Tara, Lindenauer Peter K
Division of Cardiology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA.
Institute for Health Delivery and Population Science, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA.
J Clin Exerc Physiol. 2017 Sep;6(3):42-49. doi: 10.31189/2165-6193-6.3.42.
One potential strategy to increasing physical activity after surgery is to utilize an ambulation orderly (AO), a dedicated employee whose assures frequent patient walking. However, the impact of an AO on physical and functional recovery from surgery is unknown.
We randomized post-operative cardiac surgical patients to receive either the AO or usual care. We measured average daily step count, changes in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, and changes in functional independence (Barthel Index.) Our primary goal was to test protocols, measure variability in activity, and establish effect sizes.
Thirty-six patients were randomized (18 per group, 45% bypass surgery). Overall, patients exhibited significant recovery of physical function from baseline to discharge in the 6MWT (from 83 to 172 meters, p < 0.001) and showed improvement in independent function (Barthel Index, 67 to 87, p <0.001). Moreover, each additional barrier to ambulation (supplemental oxygen, intravenous poles/fluid, walkers, urinary catheters, and chest tubes) reduced average daily step count by 330 steps/barrier, p = 0.04. However, the AO intervention resulted in only a small difference in average daily step counts (2718 vs. 2541 steps/day, Cohen's d = 0.16, 608 patients needed for larger trial), which we attributed to several trial factors that likely weakened the AO intervention.
In this pilot study, we observed significant in-hospital physical and functional recovery from surgery, but the addition of an AO made only marginal differences in daily step counts. Future studies should consider stepped-wedge or cluster trial designs to increase intervention effectiveness.
Clinicaltrials.gov unique identifier: NCT02375282.
术后增加身体活动的一种潜在策略是利用一名专门的助行员(AO),其负责确保患者频繁行走。然而,AO对手术身体和功能恢复的影响尚不清楚。
我们将心脏外科术后患者随机分为接受AO或常规护理两组。我们测量了平均每日步数、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)距离的变化以及功能独立性的变化(Barthel指数)。我们的主要目标是测试方案、测量活动变异性并确定效应量。
36名患者被随机分组(每组18名,45%为搭桥手术)。总体而言,患者在6MWT中从基线到出院身体功能有显著恢复(从83米到172米,p<0.001),独立功能也有改善(Barthel指数,从67到87,p<0.001)。此外,每增加一个行走障碍(补充氧气、静脉输液杆/液体、助行器、导尿管和胸管),平均每日步数就减少330步/障碍,p = 0.04。然而,AO干预仅使平均每日步数有微小差异(2718步/天对2541步/天,Cohen's d = 0.16,大型试验需要608名患者),我们将其归因于几个可能削弱AO干预的试验因素。
在这项初步研究中,我们观察到患者术后在院内身体和功能有显著恢复,但增加AO对每日步数的影响很小。未来的研究应考虑采用阶梯楔形或整群试验设计以提高干预效果。
Clinicaltrials.gov唯一标识符:NCT02375282。