文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经心尖与经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后左心室重构和功能变化。

Left ventricular remodeling and function after transapical versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):738-744. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28074. Epub 2019 Jan 27.


DOI:10.1002/ccd.28074
PMID:30688003
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of utilizing transapical (TA) access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on cardiac function has not been well studied. AIMS: The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the direct effects of TA access for TAVR on myocardial function parameters and their correlation with 4-year survival. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty propensity matched patients, who underwent TAVR using Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, CA) between February 15, 2012 and June 17, 2016 (115 TA and 115 transfemoral [TF] routes) were studied. The pre- and 1 month post-TAVR echocardiographic features of both groups were compared. The 4-year survival in both groups was analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics, diastolic function parameters, left ventricular (LV) chamber size, and ejection fraction were similar between matched TA and TF groups. At 1 month following TAVR, there was a significant increase in stroke volume index (SVI) in both TA (mean increase 7 cm /m ; P = 0.03) and TF groups (mean increase 7 cm /m ; P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly increased post TF TAVR (mean increase 2%; P = 0.008), but no significant increase was observed post TA TAVR (mean increase 1%; P = 0.27). Both groups had significant improvement in aortic valve (AV) hemodynamics post-TAVR (P < 0.001). Overall, there were no significant differences in the mean change of SVI, LVEF, or left ventricular end diastolic dimensions (LVEDDs) post TA versus TF TAVR. There was no significant difference in 4-year survival in the TF compared to TA group (49% vs 50%, P = 0.43). CONCLUSION: Both TA and TF TAVR were equally associated with favorable changes in LV SVI and AV hemodynamics in 30 days. TA TAVR patients had similar 4 year survival to propensity matched TF TAVR; therefore, TA TAVR remains an acceptable alternative access route in patients not amenable to TF TAVR.

摘要

背景:经心尖(TA)入路行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)对心功能的影响尚未得到很好的研究。

目的:本回顾性研究旨在确定 TA 入路行 TAVR 对心肌功能参数的直接影响及其与 4 年生存率的相关性。

方法:研究纳入 2012 年 2 月 15 日至 2016 年 6 月 17 日期间接受 Sapien 瓣膜(爱德华生命科学公司,欧文,加利福尼亚州)TAVR 的 330 例经倾向评分匹配的患者(TA 组 115 例,经股动脉[TF]组 115 例)。比较两组患者 TAVR 前后 1 个月的超声心动图特征。分析两组患者的 4 年生存率。

结果:匹配的 TA 和 TF 组患者的基线临床特征、舒张功能参数、左心室(LV)腔大小和射血分数相似。TAVR 后 1 个月,TA(平均增加 7cm /m;P=0.03)和 TF 组(平均增加 7cm /m;P<0.001)的每搏输出量指数(SVI)均显著增加。TF 组 TAVR 后左心室射血分数(LVEF)显著增加(平均增加 2%;P=0.008),但 TA 组 TAVR 后无显著增加(平均增加 1%;P=0.27)。两组主动脉瓣(AV)血流动力学均有显著改善(P<0.001)。总的来说,TA 与 TF 组 TAVR 后 SVI、LVEF 或左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)的平均变化无显著差异。TF 组与 TA 组 4 年生存率无显著差异(49%与 50%,P=0.43)。

结论:TA 和 TF 组 TAVR 均在 30 天内导致 LV SVI 和 AV 血流动力学的有利变化。TA 组 TAVR 患者的 4 年生存率与倾向性匹配的 TF 组 TAVR 患者相似;因此,TA 组 TAVR 仍然是不能接受 TF TAVR 的患者的一种可接受的替代入路。

相似文献

[1]
Left ventricular remodeling and function after transapical versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019-1-27

[2]
Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Is Associated With Increased Cardiac Mortality in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Insights From the PARTNER I Trial.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017-12-11

[3]
Direct Comparison of Feasibility and Safety of Transfemoral Versus Transaortic Versus Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016-11-28

[4]
Dose approach matter? A meta-analysis of outcomes following transfemoral versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021-7-28

[5]
Propensity-matched comparisons of clinical outcomes after transapical or transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER)-I trial substudy.

Circulation. 2015-4-1

[6]
Alternative access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older adults: A collaborative study from France and United States.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018-7-3

[7]
Impact of transfemoral versus transapical access on mortality among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016

[8]
Clinical and Functional Outcomes Associated With Myocardial Injury After Transfemoral and Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Subanalysis From the PARTNER Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves).

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015-9

[9]
Reversibility of Cardiac Function Predicts Outcome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017-7-11

[10]
In-Hospital Outcomes with Transfemoral Versus Transapical Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

J Clin Med. 2025-2-28

[2]
Reverse left ventricular remodeling after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024-7-4

[3]
Left atrial function index (LAFI) and outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2022-8

[4]
Left Ventricular Apex: A "Minimally Invasive Motorway" for Safe Cardiovascular Procedures.

J Clin Med. 2021-8-27

[5]
Dose approach matter? A meta-analysis of outcomes following transfemoral versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021-7-28

[6]
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a focus on transcarotid: a review of the current literature.

Ann Transl Med. 2019-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索