Suppr超能文献

放置在非患侧脚踝的活动监测器在测量中风后个体社区行走时的步数方面是准确的:一项验证研究。

Activity Monitor Placed at the Nonparetic Ankle Is Accurate in Measuring Step Counts During Community Walking in Poststroke Individuals: A Validation Study.

作者信息

Duclos Noémie C, Aguiar Larissa T, Aissaoui Rachid, Faria Christina D C M, Nadeau Sylvie, Duclos Cyril

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

PM R. 2019 Sep;11(9):963-971. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12080. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different environmental factors may affect the accuracy of step-count activity monitors (AM). However, the validation conditions for AM accuracy largely differ from ecological environments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the accuracy of AM in counting steps among poststroke individuals: during different locomotor tasks, with AM placed at the nonparetic ankle or hip, and when walking in a laboratory or inside a mall.

DESIGN

Validation study.

SETTINGS

Laboratory and community settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty persons with chronic hemiparesis, independent walkers.

METHODS

First session: participants performed level walking (6-minute walk test [6MWT]), ramps, and stairs in the laboratory with AM placed at the nonparetic ankle and hip. Second session: participants walked a mall circuit, including the three tasks, with AM placed at the nonparetic ankle. The sessions were video recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Absolute difference between the steps counted by AM and the steps viewed on the video recordings (errors, %); occurrence of errors greater than 10%.

RESULTS

Median errors were similar for the 6MWT (0.86 [0.22, 7.70]%), ramps (2.17 [0.89, 9.61]%), and stairs (8.33 [2.65, 19.22]%) with AM at the ankle. Step-count error was lower when AM was placed at the ankle (8.33 [2.65, 19.22]%) than at the hip (9.26 [3.25, 42.63]%, P = .03). The greatest errors were observed among the slowest participants (≤0.4 m/s) on ramps and stairs, whereas some faster participants (>1 m/s) experienced the greatest error during the 6MWT. Median error was slightly increased in the mall circuit (2.67 [0.61, 12.54]%) compared with the 6MWT (0.50 [0.24, 6.79]%, P = .04), with more participants showing errors >10% during the circuit (7 vs 2, P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Step counts are accurately measured with AM placed at the nonparetic ankle in laboratory and community settings. Accuracy can be altered by stairs and ramps among the slowest walkers and by prolonged walking tasks among faster walkers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

不同的环境因素可能会影响步数活动监测器(AM)的准确性。然而,AM准确性的验证条件与生态环境有很大差异。

目的

评估并比较AM在中风后个体中计算步数的准确性:在不同的运动任务期间、AM放置在非瘫痪侧脚踝或髋部时,以及在实验室或商场内行走时。

设计

验证性研究。

设置

实验室和社区环境。

参与者

20名慢性偏瘫且能够独立行走的患者。

方法

第一阶段:参与者在实验室中进行平地行走(6分钟步行试验[6MWT])、斜坡行走和上下楼梯,AM分别放置在非瘫痪侧脚踝和髋部。第二阶段:参与者在商场内完成包含这三项任务的行走路线,AM放置在非瘫痪侧脚踝。各阶段均进行视频记录。

主要测量指标

AM计数的步数与视频记录中观察到的步数之间的绝对差异(误差,%);误差大于10%的发生率。

结果

当AM放置在脚踝处时,6MWT(0.86[0.22, 7.70]%)、斜坡行走(2.17[0.89, 9.61]%)和上下楼梯(8.33[2.65, 19.22]%)的中位数误差相似。当AM放置在脚踝处时(8.33[2.65, 19.22]%),步数计数误差低于放置在髋部时(9.26[3.25, 42.63]%,P = 0.03)。在斜坡和楼梯上,速度最慢的参与者(≤0.4米/秒)误差最大,而在6MWT期间,一些速度较快的参与者(>1米/秒)误差最大。与6MWT(0.50[0.24, 6.79]%)相比,商场行走路线中的中位数误差略有增加(2.67[0.61, 12.54]%,P = 0.04),在行走路线中有更多参与者的误差>10%(7例对2例,P = 0.05)。

结论

在实验室和社区环境中,将AM放置在非瘫痪侧脚踝可准确测量步数。最慢步行者在上下楼梯和斜坡行走时以及较快步行者在长时间行走任务中,准确性可能会改变。

证据级别

III级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验