Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Sep;27(9):3555-3561. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-4652-4. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
To examine whether experiences of positive respectful encounters and negative disrespectful encounters differ between sickness absentees with a cancer diagnosis and sickness absentees with other diagnoses, especially in relation to their ability to return to work (RTW).
A total of 9032 long-term sickness absentees in Sweden responded to a questionnaire (response rate 52%) about experiences of positive and negative encounters with healthcare professionals. The association between different types of such encounters and participants feeling respected or disrespected were calculated with population attributable risk with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The perceived impact on ability to RTW was also examined.
Significantly, larger proportions among those who experienced a positive encounter and also felt respected stated that those encounters facilitated their ability to RTW, compared to those who experienced a positive encounter without feeling respected: among cancer absentees the difference in proportions were 21% (CI, 7-34) versus 50% (CI, 45-55); among absentees with other diagnoses 42% (CI, 37-47) versus 63% (CI, 61-64). Similar comparisons among sick-listed who experienced negative encounters indicated that also feeling disrespected impeded ability to RTW among a significantly larger proportion of those with other diagnoses [51% (CI, 48-54) versus 35% (CI, 31-39) of those not feeling disrespected]. Among cancer absentees, the corresponding proportions were 20% (CI, 9-30) versus 25% (CI, 9-41).
Compared to sickness absentees with other diagnoses, a larger proportion of cancer sickness absentees stated that they were facilitated by respectful encounters and not impeded by disrespectful encounters, regarding self-estimated ability to RTW. More research is needed to examine whether these differences can be associated with use of a patient-centered encountering approach.
探讨患有癌症和其他疾病的缺勤人员在积极尊重的经历和消极不尊重的经历方面是否存在差异,特别是与他们重返工作岗位(RTW)的能力相关的差异。
瑞典共有 9032 名长期缺勤人员对一项关于与医疗保健专业人员积极和消极接触经历的问卷做出了回应(回应率为 52%)。使用人群归因风险比及其 95%置信区间(CI)来计算不同类型的此类接触与参与者感到尊重或不尊重之间的关联。还检查了这些接触对重返工作岗位能力的感知影响。
与经历积极接触但感到受到尊重的人相比,经历积极接触但没有感到受到尊重的人,报告说这些接触有助于他们重返工作岗位的比例显著更高:在癌症缺勤人员中,这一比例差异为 21%(CI,7-34)比 50%(CI,45-55);在其他诊断缺勤人员中为 42%(CI,37-47)比 63%(CI,61-64)。在经历消极接触的病假人员中进行类似的比较表明,感到不被尊重也会显著阻碍更大比例的其他诊断患者重返工作岗位[51%(CI,48-54)比 35%(CI,31-39)未感到不被尊重的人]。在癌症缺勤人员中,相应的比例为 20%(CI,9-30)比 25%(CI,9-41)。
与其他诊断的缺勤人员相比,更大比例的癌症缺勤人员表示,他们受到尊重的接触有助于他们估计自己重返工作岗位的能力,而不受不尊重接触的阻碍。需要进一步研究这些差异是否可以与使用以患者为中心的接触方法相关联。