Smith Zachary R, Rangarajan Krishna, Barrow Jennifer, Carter Danielle, Coons James C, Dzierba Amy L, Falvey Jennifer, Fester Keith A, Guido Maria R, Hao Diana, Ou Narith N, Pogue Kristen T, MacDonald Nancy C
Department of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jan 25;76(3):153-165. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy020.
The Delphi method was used to develop best practice recommendations (BPR) for safe use of pulmonary hypertension (PH) pharmacotherapies and to describe the pharmacist's role in provision of care.
A core group reviewed PH medication-safety literature and developed initial BPR. Pharmacists practicing at PH-accredited Centers of Comprehensive Care who met defined PH expert criteria were invited to participate on an expert panel. In round 1 of a 4-round Delphi process, expert input was provided on the BPR. Feedback was incorporated into BPR for the next round. Round 2 proceeded in identical fashion to round 1. In round 3, BPR were deliberated in a teleconference and underwent voting at the cessation of the round using a 5-point Likert scale. Median scores of < 2.5, 2.5-3.75, and > 3.75 resulted in a best practice statement being rejected, reviewed in round 4, or accepted in the final BPR, respectively. In round 4, the remaining BPR were discussed and underwent voting. BPR were assigned a level of evidence and strength of recommendation based on voting results.
Eleven PH experts agreed to participate and met expert inclusion criteria, along with 2 pharmacists from the core group, bringing the total number of expert panel members to 13. To guide safe use of PH pharmacotherapies, 26 BPR were developed, categorized into 5 practice domains, comprising the PH Care Center accreditation process, inpatient practice, formulary management, diagnostics, and ambulatory care. BPR included provisions for safe use of parenteral prostacyclin agents and healthcare practitioner education.
The Delphi method was used to develop BPR to guide safe use of PH pharmacotherapies.
采用德尔菲法制定肺动脉高压(PH)药物安全使用的最佳实践建议(BPR),并描述药剂师在提供护理中的作用。
一个核心小组查阅了PH药物安全文献并制定了初步的BPR。邀请在经PH认证的综合护理中心执业且符合既定PH专家标准的药剂师参加专家小组。在四轮德尔菲法的第一轮中,专家对BPR提供了意见。反馈意见被纳入下一轮的BPR中。第二轮以与第一轮相同的方式进行。在第三轮中,通过电话会议对BPR进行审议,并在本轮结束时使用5点李克特量表进行投票。中位数得分<2.5、2.5 - 3.75和>3.75分别导致最佳实践声明被拒绝、在第四轮中进行审查或在最终的BPR中被接受。在第四轮中,对其余的BPR进行了讨论并进行了投票。根据投票结果为BPR分配证据水平和推荐强度。
11名PH专家同意参与并符合专家纳入标准,核心小组的2名药剂师也参与其中,使专家小组成员总数达到13人。为指导PH药物的安全使用,制定了26条BPR,分为5个实践领域,包括PH护理中心认证过程、住院实践、处方管理、诊断和门诊护理。BPR包括肠外前列环素类药物安全使用的规定和医疗保健从业者教育。
采用德尔菲法制定BPR以指导PH药物的安全使用。