• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症分期和分级对生育力保存结果和卵巢刺激反应的影响。

Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):530-538. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey382.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/dey382
PMID:30689898
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Do the stage and grade of malignancy affect the fertility preservation outcome in females?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Patients with high-grade cancer have a decreased number of retrieved mature oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Cancer has local and systemic effects on the host. The effects of cancer spread and aggressiveness on the ovarian function and stimulation response remain unclear.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective cohort study evaluating data of all fertility preservation treatment cycles among women with cancer at the reproductive unit of the McGill University Health Centre in the period from 2008 to 2017.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Study inclusion criteria were age 18-38 years, first stimulation cycle, GnRH-antagonist protocol and early follicular phase stimulation start. Only one stimulation cycle per patient was included. Patients with ovarian pathology, previous ovarian surgery and previous chemo- or radiotherapy were excluded. The outcomes of women with low-stage cancer (local tumor Stage I-II, no lymph node involvement, no metastases) were compared with those with high-stage disease (local tumor Stage III-IV, lymph node involvement or metastases). Similarly we compared those with low-grade (G1-2) and high-grade (G3-4) malignancies. The primary outcome measure was the number of mature oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes included the total number of retrieved oocytes, the number of vitrified oocytes, and the number of frozen embryos. We used Student's t-test for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon test for skewed data. To determine factors associated with good fertility preservation outcome defined as over 10 retrieved mature oocytes, we used multivariate logistic regression.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 147 patients were included in the final analysis. Age, body mass index, ovarian reserve parameters of the study groups in stage- and grade-based analyses were similar. Compared to women with low-stage cancer (n = 83), those with high-stage cancer (n = 64) required a higher dose of gonadotropin (P = 0.02). The number of retrieved mature oocytes (9 (7-13) versus 8 (5-12); P = 0.37) and vitrified oocytes (10 (7-15) versus 10 (7-13); P = 0.53) were similar between the two groups. However, in cycles where fertilization of all retrieved oocytes was performed, the fertilization rate (82.7% versus 71.5%; P = 0.03) and the number of vitrified embryos (6.2 ± 3.2 versus 4.3 ± 2.1; P = 0.01) were higher in the low-stage group. Compared to patients with low-grade cancer (n = 62), those with high-grade disease (n = 85) had significantly lower number of retrieved mature oocytes (11 (7-15) versus 8 (5-11); P = 0.002) and vitrified oocytes (12 (8-15) versus 10 (7-11); P = 0.005). The number of vitrified embryos was lower in high-grade group (6.5 ± 3.5 versus 4.6 ± 2.3; P = 0.03) in cycles where the fertilization was performed. In multivariate logistical analysis, the low-grade cancer was significantly associated with retrieval of over 10 mature oocytes (OR = 4.26; 95% CI 1.82-9.98; P = 0.0009).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main limitations of the study include its retrospective design and the relatively small sample size in the embryological outcome analysis. The results of our study should be viewed with caution as different malignancy types were included in the study groups, although their distribution between the study groups was similar.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Cancer grade seems to have a negative impact on the fertility preservation outcome and the ovarian stimulation response.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Authors have not received any funding to support this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

摘要

研究问题

恶性肿瘤的分期和分级是否会影响女性的生育力保存结果?

总结答案

高分级癌症患者的成熟卵母细胞数量和可冷冻胚胎数量减少。

已知情况

癌症对宿主有局部和全身影响。癌症的扩散和侵袭性对卵巢功能和刺激反应的影响尚不清楚。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估了 2008 年至 2017 年期间在麦吉尔大学健康中心生殖单位接受癌症生育力保存治疗的所有女性的生育力保存治疗周期的数据。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:研究纳入标准为年龄 18-38 岁、首次刺激周期、使用 GnRH 拮抗剂方案和早卵泡期开始刺激。每位患者仅纳入一个刺激周期。排除卵巢疾病、卵巢手术、化疗或放疗史的患者。低分期癌症(局部肿瘤 I-II 期,无淋巴结受累,无转移)患者的结果与高分期疾病(局部肿瘤 III-IV 期,淋巴结受累或转移)患者进行了比较。同样,我们比较了低分级(G1-2)和高分级(G3-4)恶性肿瘤患者的结果。主要结局指标是获得的成熟卵母细胞数量。次要结局包括总获卵数、可冷冻卵母细胞数和可冷冻胚胎数。我们使用学生 t 检验进行正态分布数据检验,使用 Wilcoxon 检验进行偏态数据检验。为了确定与获得超过 10 个成熟卵母细胞的良好生育力保存结果相关的因素,我们使用了多变量逻辑回归。

主要结果和机会的作用

共有 147 名患者纳入最终分析。基于分期和分级的分析,两组患者的年龄、体重指数、研究组卵巢储备参数相似。与低分期癌症(n=83)患者相比,高分期癌症(n=64)患者需要更高剂量的促性腺激素(P=0.02)。两组患者获得的成熟卵母细胞数量(9(7-13)与 8(5-12);P=0.37)和可冷冻卵母细胞数量(10(7-15)与 10(7-13);P=0.53)相似。然而,在所有回收卵母细胞均进行受精的周期中,低分期组的受精率(82.7%比 71.5%;P=0.03)和可冷冻胚胎数(6.2±3.2 比 4.3±2.1;P=0.01)较高。与低分级癌症(n=62)患者相比,高分级疾病(n=85)患者获得的成熟卵母细胞数量明显减少(11(7-15)与 8(5-11);P=0.002)和可冷冻卵母细胞数量(12(8-15)与 10(7-11);P=0.005)。在进行受精的周期中,高分级组的可冷冻胚胎数(6.5±3.5 比 4.6±2.3;P=0.03)较低。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,低分级癌症与获得超过 10 个成熟卵母细胞显著相关(OR=4.26;95%CI 1.82-9.98;P=0.0009)。

局限性、谨慎的原因:研究的主要局限性包括其回顾性设计和胚胎学结局分析中相对较小的样本量。由于研究组中包括不同类型的癌症,因此应谨慎看待我们的研究结果,尽管它们在研究组中的分布相似。

更广泛的影响

癌症分级似乎对生育力保存结果和卵巢刺激反应有负面影响。

研究资金/利益冲突:作者没有得到任何资金支持来支持这项研究。没有利益冲突需要申报。

相似文献

1
Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.癌症分期和分级对生育力保存结果和卵巢刺激反应的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):530-538. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey382.
2
Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.女性肿瘤患者的生育力保存:癌症类型对卵巢刺激反应的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):2051-2059. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew158.
3
Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes.选择性和肿瘤生育力保存:与 IVF 结局相关的因素。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2222-2231. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey321.
4
Cryopreservation of in vitro matured oocytes in addition to ovarian tissue freezing for fertility preservation in paediatric female cancer patients before and after cancer therapy.在癌症治疗前后,对儿科女性癌症患者进行体外成熟卵母细胞的冷冻保存以及卵巢组织冷冻,以保留生育能力。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Apr;31(4):750-62. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew007. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
Influence of stage and grade of breast cancer on fertility preservation outcome in reproductive-aged women.乳腺癌分期和分级对生育期妇女保留生育力结局的影响。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Feb;40(2):215-222. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
6
Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的传统卵巢刺激和单胚胎移植。在利用所有新鲜和冷冻胚胎后,我们需要多少个卵母细胞才能使累积活产率最大化?
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev316. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
7
BRCA1/2 gene mutations do not affect the capacity of oocytes from breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation to mature in vitro.BRCA1/2 基因突变并不影响乳腺癌患者候选者的卵母细胞在体外成熟的能力。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):374-379. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey358.
8
Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.1050名女性在一个辅助生殖技术周期(包括所有后续冻融周期)后的累积活产率:一项比较促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案的随机对照试验的次要结果。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):556-567. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew358.
9
Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.卵母细胞供体刺激对受体结局的影响:来自美国一家全国性卵母细胞供体库的数据。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):847-858. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa003.
10
Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature.我们是否应该进行卵母细胞积累以保留特纳综合征女性的生育能力?一项多中心研究及文献系统综述。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Sep 5;38(9):1733-1745. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead135.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients with gynecological malignancies are similar to other IVF patients without cancer for clinical and molecular reproductive parameters and DNA damage response pattern.对于临床和分子生殖参数以及DNA损伤反应模式而言,妇科恶性肿瘤患者与其他无癌症的体外受精患者相似。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13628. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64403-y.
2
Feasibility and efficiency of delayed ovarian stimulation and metaphase II oocyte banking for fertility preservation and childbearing desire after fertility-impairing treatment.延迟卵巢刺激和中期 II 卵母细胞冷冻保存以保留生育力和生育愿望在生育能力受损治疗后的可行性和效率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42583-3.
3
Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases.
癌症和自身免疫性疾病的性腺毒性治疗后的生育力保存。
J Ovarian Res. 2023 Aug 10;16(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x.
4
Researching the Phenomenon of Poor Ovarian Responders and Management Strategies in IVF: A Narrative Review.探讨 IVF 中卵巢反应不良现象及管理策略:一项叙述性综述。
Acta Med Acad. 2022 Aug;51(2):108-122. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.379.
5
Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes.癌症后的生育能力:风险与成功案例
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 19;14(10):2500. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102500.
6
The Experience of Fertility Preservation in a Single Tertiary Center in Korea.韩国一家三级医疗中心的生育力保存经验。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 19;13:845051. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.845051. eCollection 2022.
7
Hereditary breast cancer and fertility preservation outcomes.遗传性乳腺癌与生育力保存结局。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 May;39(5):1163-1168. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02486-0. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
8
Breast cancer grade and stage do not affect fertility preservation outcomes.乳腺癌分级和分期并不影响生育力保存结果。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 May;39(5):1155-1161. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02473-5. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
9
Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles.不同激素受体谱乳腺癌患者的卵巢刺激和生育保存结局。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Apr;37(4):913-921. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01730-9. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Oocyte Cryopreservation in Oncological Patients: Eighteen Years Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Center.肿瘤患者的卵母细胞冷冻保存:三级医疗转诊中心的18年经验
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Sep 3;10:600. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00600. eCollection 2019.