• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1995-2013 年格拉斯哥重症监护病房成人难治性癫痫持续状态的纵向研究突显了对诱发性和非诱发性癫痫持续状态采取行动的必要性。

Refractory status epilepticus in adults admitted to ITU in Glasgow 1995-2013 a longitudinal audit highlighting the need for action for provoked and unprovoked status epilepticus.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom.

Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, United Kingdom; School of Medicine, Wolfson Medical School Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Seizure. 2019 Feb;65:138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2019.01.011
PMID:30690407
Abstract

PURPOSE

Our primary objective was to determine incidence of status epilepticus in adults admitted to 5 ITU settings in Glasgow over 18 years. We wanted to investigate if there are any change in causes and outcomes of SE over last decade. We also compared outcomes of De Novo statuts Epilpeticus (DNSE) and Stauts Epilepticus in patients with previous Epilepsy (SEPE).

METHODS

The NHS GGC Research Ethics Committee gave permission for this study to continue without a full ethics submission. Between 2013 and 2016, coding records were searched across NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde for adults over the age of 16 years admitted to an Intensive Care Facility in any of the hospitals in Glasgow.

RESULTS

633 cases were included in study. Cases were separated depending on whether there had been previous epilepsy (SEPE n = 214) or De Novo Status Epilepticus (DNSE, n = 419). Causes in both groups were listed, with 52% of those with DNSE having some contribution from substance misuse. In SEPE, this was felt to play a role in 33.7%. Duration of stay in both groups was similar, but the longest in-patient stays were in the DNSE group. Admission mortality was significantly higher in DNSE than in SEPE (13.8% versus 7.5%). This mortality risk was most closely associated with substance misuse in the group with DNSE.

CONCLUSION

DNSE has a worse prognosis than SEPE. A presentation with DNSE is sign of a system in peril, even where episodes are provoked by alcohol and or drug use. Such episodes should spark off a chain of multispecialty care in order to address this recurring and persisting public health catastrophe.

摘要

目的

我们的主要目的是确定在格拉斯哥的 5 个 ICU 环境中,18 年来成年患者癫痫持续状态的发生率。我们想调查过去十年中癫痫持续状态的病因和结局是否有任何变化。我们还比较了既往癫痫患者新发癫痫持续状态(DNSE)和癫痫持续状态(SEPE)的结局。

方法

NHS GGC 研究伦理委员会批准本研究在无需完整伦理申请的情况下继续进行。在 2013 年至 2016 年期间,在 NHS 大格拉斯哥和克莱德的编码记录中,搜索了年龄在 16 岁以上并在格拉斯哥任何一家医院的重症监护病房住院的成年人。

结果

633 例患者纳入研究。根据是否有既往癫痫(SEPE n=214)或新发癫痫持续状态(DNSE,n=419),将病例分开。列出了两组的病因,DNSE 组有 52%的患者有物质滥用的一定影响,而 SEPE 组则认为这一比例为 33.7%。两组患者的住院时间相似,但 DNSE 组的住院时间最长。DNSE 组的入院死亡率明显高于 SEPE 组(13.8%对 7.5%)。这种死亡率风险与 DNSE 组的物质滥用密切相关。

结论

DNSE 的预后比 SEPE 差。DNSE 的表现表明系统处于危险之中,即使发作是由酒精和/或药物使用引起的。这种发作应该引发一系列多学科护理,以解决这种反复出现的持续公共卫生灾难。

相似文献

1
Refractory status epilepticus in adults admitted to ITU in Glasgow 1995-2013 a longitudinal audit highlighting the need for action for provoked and unprovoked status epilepticus.1995-2013 年格拉斯哥重症监护病房成人难治性癫痫持续状态的纵向研究突显了对诱发性和非诱发性癫痫持续状态采取行动的必要性。
Seizure. 2019 Feb;65:138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
2
A one-year prospective study of refractory status epilepticus in Modena, Italy.意大利摩德纳难治性癫痫持续状态的一年前瞻性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.05.022.
3
De novo status epilepticus is associated with adverse outcome: An 11-year retrospective study in Hong Kong.新发癫痫持续状态与不良预后相关:香港一项11年的回顾性研究。
Seizure. 2016 Aug;40:42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
4
Long-term outcome of refractory status epilepticus in adults: A retrospective population-based study.成人难治性癫痫持续状态的长期预后:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Jul;133:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
5
Etiologies and characteristics of refractory status epilepticus cases in different areas of the world: Results from a global audit.世界各地难治性癫痫持续状态病例的病因和特征:全球审计结果。
Epilepsia. 2018 Oct;59 Suppl 2:100-107. doi: 10.1111/epi.14496. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
Prognosis and predictors of outcome of refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus in adults treated in neurointensive care unit.神经重症监护病房中接受治疗的成年难治性全面性惊厥性癫痫持续状态的预后及结局预测因素
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;126:7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.038. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Factors affecting mortality of refractory status epilepticus.影响难治性癫痫持续状态患者死亡率的因素。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Feb;141(2):123-131. doi: 10.1111/ane.13173. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Refractory status epilepticus: a prospective observational study.难治性癫痫持续状态:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Epilepsia. 2010 Feb;51(2):251-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02323.x. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
9
Incidence and mortality of super-refractory status epilepticus in adults.成人超难治性癫痫持续状态的发病率和死亡率
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:131-4. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.065. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
Predictors and prognosis of refractory status epilepticus treated in a neurological intensive care unit.神经重症监护病房中难治性癫痫持续状态的预测因素及预后
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;76(4):534-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.041947.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidance for: The acute management of status epilepticus in adult patients.适用于:成年患者癫痫持续状态的急性处理指南。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 May 8;26(2):249-262. doi: 10.1177/17511437251321338. eCollection 2025 May.