Suppr超能文献

哪些检查测试可以检测出偏头痛患者颈椎肌肉骨骼损伤的差异?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Which Examination Tests Detect Differences in Cervical Musculoskeletal Impairments in People With Migraine? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Academic Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research, University of Lübeck, Medical Section, Lübeck, Germany; and Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical-Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Centre for Therapy and Training, Schoen Klinik München, München, Germany.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2019 May 1;99(5):549-569. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patients with migraine report associated neck pain. Whether neck pain is a symptom of migraine or an indicator for associated cervical musculoskeletal impairment has not yet been determined. Physical examination tests to detect cervical impairments in people with headache have been suggested, but results have not been evaluated systematically and combined in meta-analyses.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify musculoskeletal impairments in people with migraine and people who were healthy (healthy controls) by reviewing published data on physical examination results.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials were searched for studies published prior to December 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Publications investigating physical examination procedures that are feasible for use in a physical therapy setting for patients with migraine and healthy controls were independently selected by 2 researchers.

DATA EXTRACTION

One researcher extracted the data into predesigned data extraction tables. Entries were checked for correctness by a second researcher. The Downs and Black Scale was used for risk-of-bias assessment by 2 reviewers independently.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-five studies (involving 1033 participants who were healthy [healthy controls] and 1371 participants with migraine) were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 18 were included in the meta-analyses (544 healthy controls and 603 participants with migraine). Overall, studies were rated as having a low to moderate risk of bias. Included studies reported 20 different test procedures. Combined mean effects indicated that 4 of the tests included in the meta-analyses distinguished between patients and controls: range of cervical motion, flexion-rotation, pressure pain thresholds, and forward head posture in a standing position.

LIMITATIONS

Manual joint testing and evaluation of trigger points were the 2 most frequently investigated tests not included in the meta-analyses because of heterogeneity of reporting and procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Three tests confirmed the presence of musculoskeletal impairments in participants with migraine when combined in meta-analyses. Pressure pain thresholds added information on sensory processing. Additional tests might be useful but require standardized protocols and reporting.

摘要

背景

大多数偏头痛患者报告伴有颈部疼痛。颈部疼痛是偏头痛的症状还是相关颈椎肌肉骨骼功能障碍的指标尚未确定。已经提出了用于检测头痛患者颈椎损伤的体格检查测试,但结果尚未系统评估并结合进行荟萃分析。

目的

本研究旨在通过回顾有关体格检查结果的已发表数据,确定偏头痛患者和健康对照者(健康对照组)的肌肉骨骼损伤。

资料来源

在 2017 年 12 月之前,检索了 PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 临床试验注册中心的研究。

研究选择

由 2 位研究人员独立选择调查用于偏头痛患者和健康对照者的物理治疗体格检查程序的可行性的研究。

数据提取

一位研究人员将数据提取到预先设计的数据提取表中。另一位研究人员检查了这些条目是否正确。两位审查员使用 Downs 和 Black 量表进行偏倚风险评估。

数据综合

35 项研究(涉及 1033 名健康对照者和 1371 名偏头痛患者)被纳入定性综合分析,18 项研究被纳入荟萃分析(544 名健康对照者和 603 名偏头痛患者)。总体而言,研究被评为具有低至中度偏倚风险。纳入的研究报告了 20 种不同的测试程序。综合平均效应表明,荟萃分析中纳入的 4 种测试可区分患者和对照者:颈椎运动范围、屈伸旋转、压痛阈值和站立位前伸头位。

局限性

由于报告和程序的异质性,手动关节测试和触发点评估是 2 种最常调查的未纳入荟萃分析的测试。

结论

3 项测试在荟萃分析中联合证实了偏头痛患者存在肌肉骨骼损伤。压痛阈值增加了对感觉处理的信息。其他测试可能有用,但需要标准化的方案和报告。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验