Department of Veterinary Sciences, Chair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinaerstrasse 13/R, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Christiane Keppler, Gallicon, Geflügelberatung, Burgstraße 24, 34593 Knüllwald Wallenstein, Germany.
Poult Sci. 2019 Jun 1;98(6):2326-2337. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez023.
For broiler genotypes to be merchandized under the animal welfare label of the German Animal Welfare Federation, several animal-based welfare indicators with upper limits are listed in a criteria catalog. We compared the prevalence of animal-based welfare indicators in 4 slow-growing broiler genotypes [Ranger Classic (RC), Ranger Gold (RG), Rowan Ranger (RoR), and Rambler Ranger (RaR)] in terms of potential approval of these genotypes for a German animal welfare label program. Chicks were housed in 16 floor pens, of which 8 had access to a winter garden. With 4 replications of each genotype, animal-based welfare indicators were assessed in 160 broilers (10 broilers per pen) on fattening days (FD) 36 and 44. The body weight of the 4 broiler genotypes differed on both examination days in decreasing order for RC, RG, RoR, and RaR (P < 0.001). The walking ability was within the scope of the animal welfare label in all genotypes; it was better in genotypes with a lower mean body weight and correlated positively with the body weight in RG, RoR, RaR, and in the pooled data of the 4 genotypes. Hock burns were only observed at a low severity score, with male broilers being affected more often than female broilers. A positive correlation of the development of hock burn with the weight of the broilers was observed on FD 44 when data of all genotypes were pooled. The footpads of all examined broilers were without lesions at both examinations. Skin scratches were observed in all genotypes at both examinations, and RC broilers differed on FD 36 from the other 3 genotypes by showing a higher prevalence of more severe scratches. Broilers of pens with access to a winter garden were affected by skin scratches more often than broilers without. With the exception of weight gain in 2 genotypes, the investigated indicators showed that all genotypes met the requirements of the animal welfare label.
为了使肉鸡品种能够在德国动物福利联合会的动物福利标签下销售,在标准目录中列出了几个具有上限的基于动物的福利指标。我们比较了 4 种生长缓慢的肉鸡品种(Ranger Classic(RC)、Ranger Gold(RG)、Rowan Ranger(RoR)和 Rambler Ranger(RaR))在基于动物的福利指标方面的流行程度,这些指标涉及这些品种是否有可能获得德国动物福利标签计划的批准。小鸡被安置在 16 个地板围栏中,其中 8 个围栏可以进入冬季花园。每个品种有 4 个重复,在育肥日(FD)36 和 44 时对 160 只肉鸡(每个围栏 10 只)进行基于动物的福利指标评估。在这两天,4 种肉鸡品种的体重均有所不同,按 RC、RG、RoR 和 RaR 的顺序依次递减(P<0.001)。在所有品种中,行走能力都在动物福利标签的范围内;体重较低的品种表现更好,并且与 RG、RoR、RaR 和 4 个品种的汇总数据中的体重呈正相关。仅观察到轻度的跗关节烧伤,雄性肉鸡比雌性肉鸡更容易受到影响。当汇总所有品种的数据时,在 FD44 时观察到跗关节烧伤的发展与肉鸡体重呈正相关。在这两次检查中,所有检查的肉鸡的脚垫都没有病变。在这两次检查中,所有品种都观察到皮肤划痕,RC 肉鸡在 FD36 时与其他 3 个品种的差异更大,表现出更严重划痕的更高流行率。有冬季花园通道的围栏中的肉鸡比没有冬季花园通道的肉鸡更容易受到皮肤划痕的影响。除了 2 个品种的体重增加外,所研究的指标表明,所有品种都符合动物福利标签的要求。