Xu Bo, Xing Run-Lin, Zhang Li, Huang Zheng-Quan, Zhang Nong-Shan, Mao Jun
The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of TCM, Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM, Nanjing, PR China; No. 1 Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, PR China.
The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of TCM, Jiangsu Province Hospital of TCM, Nanjing, PR China.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Mar;53(2):129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify the role of Matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) -1607 1G/2G (rs1799750) polymorphism on the osteoarthritis (OA) risk.
Articles were selected by retrieving the Web of Science, Embase and Pubmed. The strength of the association between -1607 1G/2G polymorphism and OA risk was assessed by odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study.
No significant association between -1607 1G/2G polymorphism and OA risk was found in all the models overall (2G2G vs 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.69 (0.36-1.32), P = 0.54; 2G2G + 2G1G vs 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.88 (0.47-1.63), P = 0.69; 2G2G vs 2G1G + 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 1.30 (0.68-2.47), P = 0.41; 2 G vs 1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.90 (0.86-1.54), P = 0.66). By subgroup analysis, significant association was found in the "< 60 years" group (2G2G vs 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 3.46 (2.13-5.62), P = 0.00; 2G2G + 2G1G vs 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.49 (0.31-0.79), P = 0.00; 2G2G vs 2G1G + 1G1G, OR (95%CI) = 2.74 (1.80-4.16, P = 0.00; 2 G vs 1G, OR (95%CI) = 0.56 (0.35-0.89), P = 0.01).
This meta-analysis showed that -1607 1G/2G polymorphism may increase the susceptibility to OA among the younger populations (<60 years). More studies with detailed information are needed to validate our conclusion.
Level I Diagnostic Study.
本荟萃分析旨在阐明基质金属蛋白酶1(MMP-1)-1607 1G/2G(rs1799750)多态性在骨关节炎(OA)风险中的作用。
通过检索科学网、Embase和PubMed来选择文章。每项研究通过优势比(OR)及相应的95%置信区间(CI)评估-1607 1G/2G多态性与OA风险之间关联的强度。
在所有模型总体中,未发现-1607 1G/2G多态性与OA风险之间存在显著关联(2G2G与1G1G相比,OR(95%CI)=0.69(0.36 - 1.32),P = 0.54;2G2G + 2G1G与1G1G相比,OR(95%CI)=0.88(0.47 - 1.63),P = 0.69;2G2G与2G1G + 1G1G相比,OR(95%CI)=1.30(0.68 - 2.47),P = 0.41;2G与1G相比,OR(95%CI)=0.90(0.86 - 1.54),P = 0.66)。通过亚组分析,在“<60岁”组中发现显著关联(2G2G与1G1G相比,OR(95%CI)=3.46(2.13 - 5.62),P = (此处原文有误,应为0.00);2G2G + 2G1G与1G1G相比,OR(95%CI)=(此处原文有误,应为0.49)(0.31 - 0.79),P = (此处原文有误,应为0.00);2G2G与2G1G + 1G1G相比,OR(95%CI)=2.74(1.80 - 4.16,P = (此处原文有误,应为0.00);2G与1G相比,OR(95%CI)=0.56(0.35 - 0.89),P = 0.01)。
本荟萃分析表明,-1607 1G/2G多态性可能增加年轻人群(<60岁)患OA的易感性。需要更多有详细信息的研究来验证我们的结论。
I级诊断研究。 (注:原文中部分P值处表述有误,已在译文中注明)