Gadbury-Amyot Cynthia C, Godley Lance W, Nelson John W
Cynthia C. Gadbury-Amyot, MS, EdD, is Associate Dean and Professor of Instructional Technology and Faculty Development, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Dentistry; Lance W. Godley, DMD, is Assistant Clinical Professor, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Dentistry; and John W. Nelson Jr., DDS, MPA, is Associate Clinical Professor and Vice-Chair, Restorative Clinical Sciences Department, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Dentistry.
J Dent Educ. 2019 Mar;83(3):275-280. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.025. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
Learning to evaluate one's own skills through reflection and self-assessment prepares dental graduates for successfully navigating an ever-changing work environment throughout their careers, but the search continues for the most effective teaching and assessment strategies to develop students' skills in these areas. Beginning with the Class of 2017, the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Dentistry adopted e-portfolios as a programmatic (four-year) global assessment measure in the predoctoral dental program, in large part to encourage the development of reflection. The aim of this study was twofold: to examine interrater reliability among raters when scoring reflective writing using a validated measure of reflection skill and to analyze students' level of reflective ability as fourth-year dental students. Reflections of all 102 students were independently evaluated by the three investigators using a grading rubric based on Bain's 5 Rs (reporting, responding, relating, reasoning/deconstructing, reconstructing). Intra-class correlation was used to assess interrater reliability among the three raters, resulting in a good range for agreement (ICC=0.67; 95% CI 0.54, 0.77). The results showed that the majority (70%) of the global reflections were rated at Level 2 (responding) and Level 3 (relating). Approximately 15% of the global reflections reached Level 4 (reasoning/deconstructing), and only one was rated at the highest level (Level 5, reconstructing). This study confirmed that reflection and reflective writing were difficult for students to accomplish. As a result, curricular enhancements at this school have been implemented that involve both faculty and student development. Ongoing evaluation is required to determine if those changes result in higher levels of reflective ability. The positive outcomes of reflection and writing warrant continued examination in how to improve this educational strategy across the curriculum.
通过反思和自我评估来学习评估自己的技能,能让牙科专业毕业生在整个职业生涯中成功应对不断变化的工作环境,但人们仍在寻找最有效的教学和评估策略,以培养学生在这些方面的技能。从2017届开始,密苏里大学堪萨斯城分校牙科学院在博士前牙科项目中采用电子档案袋作为一项系统性(四年)的整体评估手段,很大程度上是为了鼓励反思能力的发展。本研究有两个目的:一是使用经过验证的反思技能测量方法,检查评分者在对反思性写作评分时的评分者间信度;二是分析牙科四年级学生的反思能力水平。三位研究者使用基于贝恩的5R(报告、回应、关联、推理/解构、重构)的评分标准,对所有102名学生的反思进行独立评估。组内相关系数用于评估三位评分者之间的评分者间信度,结果显示一致性范围良好(ICC = 0.67;95% CI 0.54, 0.77)。结果表明,大多数(70%)的整体反思被评为2级(回应)和3级(关联)。约15%的整体反思达到4级(推理/解构),只有一篇被评为最高级别(5级,重构)。本研究证实反思和反思性写作对学生来说很难完成。因此,该校已实施了涉及教师和学生发展的课程改进措施。需要持续评估以确定这些变化是否会带来更高水平的反思能力。反思和写作的积极成果值得继续研究如何在整个课程中改进这一教育策略。