• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人惊厥性癫痫持续状态的预后决定因素:来自印度中部的一项双向性研究

Determinants of Outcome in Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: An Ambispective Study from Central India.

作者信息

Dani Raunak, Sodani Ajoy, Telang Kapil, Nigam Richa

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and P.G. Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):84-90. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_466_17.

DOI:10.4103/aian.AIAN_466_17
PMID:30692765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327706/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The determinants of the outcome in adult convulsive status epilepticus(CSE), also the implication of the value of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and random blood sugar at admission on the outcome are not clear.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to look for the determinants of unfavorable outcome in CSE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ambispectively gathered data from 55 patients, treated consecutively with identical protocol during January 2010-December 2016, were analyzed. The demographic and clinical variables were identified and correlated with outcome in each individual.

RESULTS

There were 65.45% males and 34.55% females. Favorable outcome (conscious and discharged) was seen in 63.6%, unfavorable (death 14.5%, absent cortical functions 10.9%, and inability to wean-off anesthetic agents 10.9%). The parameters associated with unfavorable outcome were female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 1.45), MAP ≤80 mmHg (OR: 2.57), time to first medical attention >5 h (OR: 127.8), and time to control clinical seizures >3.5 h (OR: 7.87). Almost 44.2% of patients with SE severity score >2 had unfavorable outcome (sensitivity 75% and specificity 45.7%). New scoring system, the CSE outcome score (CSEOS, developed by combining the predictors associated with higher odds of poor outcome), predicted the poor outcome with the sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 54.29%, respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Low MAP and delay of >3.5 h in treatment initiation or seizure control are the key determinants of poor outcome in CSE. With the incorporation of CSEOS, we believe that our findings can be helpful in the process of clinical decision-making and prognostication of patients with CSE.

摘要

背景

成人惊厥性癫痫持续状态(CSE)预后的决定因素,以及入院时平均动脉压(MAP)和随机血糖值对预后的影响尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在寻找CSE不良预后的决定因素。

材料与方法

对2010年1月至2016年12月期间连续采用相同方案治疗的55例患者进行回顾性收集数据并分析。确定人口统计学和临床变量,并将其与每个个体的预后进行关联分析。

结果

男性占65.45%,女性占34.55%。63.6%的患者预后良好(意识清醒并出院),不良预后(死亡14.5%,无皮质功能10.9%,无法停用麻醉剂10.9%)。与不良预后相关的参数为女性性别(比值比[OR]:1.45)、MAP≤80 mmHg(OR:2.57)、首次就医时间>5小时(OR:127.8)以及控制临床癫痫发作时间>3.5小时(OR:7.87)。几乎44.2%的SE严重程度评分>2的患者预后不良(敏感性75%,特异性45.7%)。新的评分系统,即CSE预后评分(CSEOS,通过结合与不良预后较高几率相关的预测因素开发),预测不良预后的敏感性和特异性分别为90%和54.29%。

讨论与结论

低MAP以及治疗开始或癫痫发作控制延迟>3.5小时是CSE不良预后的关键决定因素。通过纳入CSEOS,我们相信我们的研究结果有助于CSE患者的临床决策和预后评估过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18f8/6327706/5a9962aab6e0/AIAN-22-84-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18f8/6327706/b415b812bfbe/AIAN-22-84-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18f8/6327706/5a9962aab6e0/AIAN-22-84-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18f8/6327706/b415b812bfbe/AIAN-22-84-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18f8/6327706/5a9962aab6e0/AIAN-22-84-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Determinants of Outcome in Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: An Ambispective Study from Central India.成人惊厥性癫痫持续状态的预后决定因素:来自印度中部的一项双向性研究
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):84-90. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_466_17.
2
Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的治疗。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2016 Mar;18(3):11. doi: 10.1007/s11940-016-0394-5.
3
Determinants of Outcomes in Convulsive Status Epilepticus: An Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Center in North India.惊厥性癫痫持续状态预后的决定因素:印度北部一家三级医疗中心的观察性研究
Cureus. 2024 May 10;16(5):e60017. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60017. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Status epilepticus severity score as a predictor for the length of stay at hospital for acute-phase treatment in convulsive status epilepticus.癫痫持续状态严重程度评分作为惊厥性癫痫持续状态急性期治疗住院时间的预测指标。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 May;75:128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
5
Predictors of outcomes and refractoriness in status epilepticus: A prospective study.癫痫持续状态的预后及难治性预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Oct;75:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus after convulsive status epilepticus: Clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors.惊厥性癫痫持续状态后的非惊厥性癫痫持续状态:临床特征、结局及预后因素
Epilepsy Res. 2018 May;142:53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
Prediction of functional outcome in patients with convulsive status epilepticus: the END-IT score.惊厥性癫痫持续状态患者功能预后的预测:END-IT评分
Crit Care. 2016 Feb 25;20:46. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1221-9.
8
Clinical and electroencephalographic findings in acutely ill adults with non-convulsive vs convulsive status epilepticus.急性病成年人非惊厥性与惊厥性癫痫持续状态的临床和脑电图表现。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2014 Jun;129(6):405-11. doi: 10.1111/ane.12200. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
9
Persistent nonconvulsive status epilepticus after the control of convulsive status epilepticus.惊厥性癫痫持续状态得到控制后的持续性非惊厥性癫痫持续状态。
Epilepsia. 1998 Aug;39(8):833-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01177.x.
10
Adult convulsive status epileptic us: clinical, etiological, and predictors of outcome study from rural population of North India.成人惊厥性癫痫持续状态:来自印度北部农村人群的临床、病因学和结局预测研究。
Int J Neurosci. 2019 Jun;129(6):573-579. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1552692. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of Outcomes in Convulsive Status Epilepticus: An Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Center in North India.惊厥性癫痫持续状态预后的决定因素:印度北部一家三级医疗中心的观察性研究
Cureus. 2024 May 10;16(5):e60017. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60017. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Factors Associated With Prolonged Length of Stay in Patients Hospitalized With Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in the United States.美国全身性惊厥性癫痫持续状态住院患者住院时间延长的相关因素。
Neurohospitalist. 2021 Oct;11(4):310-316. doi: 10.1177/19418744211000534. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of outcomes and refractoriness in status epilepticus: A prospective study.癫痫持续状态的预后及难治性预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Oct;75:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
25 years of advances in the definition, classification and treatment of status epilepticus.癫痫持续状态在定义、分类及治疗方面25年的进展
Seizure. 2017 Jan;44:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
3
Role of EMSE and STESS scores in the outcome evaluation of status epilepticus.
EMSE和STESS评分在癫痫持续状态结局评估中的作用。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Nov;64(Pt A):140-142. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
4
Status Epilepticus: Epidemiology and Public Health Needs.癫痫持续状态:流行病学与公共卫生需求
J Clin Med. 2016 Aug 16;5(8):71. doi: 10.3390/jcm5080071.
5
Prognostic factors of status epilepticus in adults.成人癫痫持续状态的预后因素。
Epileptic Disord. 2016 Sep 1;18(3):297-304. doi: 10.1684/epd.2016.0855.
6
An audit of the predictors of outcome in status epilepticus from a resource-poor country: a comparison with developed countries.来自资源匮乏国家的癫痫持续状态预后预测因素的审计:与发达国家的比较。
Epileptic Disord. 2016 Jun 1;18(2):163-72. doi: 10.1684/epd.2016.0832.
7
Prediction of functional outcome in patients with convulsive status epilepticus: the END-IT score.惊厥性癫痫持续状态患者功能预后的预测:END-IT评分
Crit Care. 2016 Feb 25;20:46. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1221-9.
8
Management of generalised convulsive status epilepticus (SE): A prospective randomised controlled study of combined treatment with intravenous lorazepam with either phenytoin, sodium valproate or levetiracetam--Pilot study.全身性惊厥性癫痫持续状态(SE)的管理:一项关于静脉注射劳拉西泮联合苯妥英钠、丙戊酸钠或左乙拉西坦治疗的前瞻性随机对照试验——初步研究
Epilepsy Res. 2015 Aug;114:52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 May 1.
9
Predicting outcome of status epilepticus.预测癫痫持续状态的预后。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.066. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Epidemiology-based mortality score in status epilepticus (EMSE).癫痫持续状态基于流行病学的死亡率评分(EMSE)。
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Apr;22(2):273-82. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0080-y.