1 Division of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.
2 Division of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2019 May;33(3):317-322. doi: 10.1177/1945892419826247. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Nonattendance to clinical appointments is a global problem appreciated by clinicians with an ambulatory presence. There are few reports of nonattendance in otolaryngology clinics, and no reports on nonattendance for a single otolaryngology subspecialty.
To describe the no-show population in rhinology clinics.
A retrospective chart review was performed involving rhinology clinics from 2 academic medical centers in the United States. All patients who either attended their clinic appointment(s) or did not attend without previously cancelling from June 2016 to May 2017 were included. Data collected included patient demographics, appointment status, season and time of visit, insurance status, type of visit (new vs established), and provider seen.
There were 2791 clinical appointments evaluated over a 12-month period at 2 rhinology clinics involving 4 fellowship-trained rhinologists. Ninety-two percent of patients kept their appointments, while 8% did not. Sex, season of visit, time of visit (am vs pm), type of visit, provider sex, provider location, or provider's experience (<10 years vs ≥10 years) were not associated with patient's attendance status. Univariate analysis showed that patient's age ≤50 ( P = .001) and primary insurance type ( P < .001) were associated with nonattendance. Medicaid as the primary insurance type was associated with clinic nonattendance. Multivariable analysis showed that age ≤ 50 years, odds ratio (OR) 1.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.30), P = .007, and primary insurance type (Medicaid: OR 3.75 [95% CI 2.58-5.45], P < .001) remained significant predictors of nonattendance.
Patients younger than 50 years and patients with Medicaid as the primary insurance types are associated with risk of missing rhinology clinic appointments. As a subspecialty, delivery of timely care and clinical efficiency could be improved by interventions directed toward improving attendance among this population.
临床预约失约是临床医生普遍关注的全球性问题。耳鼻喉科门诊失约的报道很少,而单一耳鼻喉科亚专科失约的报道则没有。
描述鼻科诊所的失约人群。
对美国 2 家学术医疗中心的鼻科诊所进行回顾性图表审查。所有在 2016 年 6 月至 2017 年 5 月期间预约就诊或未预约但未提前取消的患者均纳入研究。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学特征、预约情况、就诊季节和时间、保险状况、就诊类型(新患者 vs 复诊患者)以及就诊医生。
在 2 家鼻科诊所的 12 个月期间共评估了 2791 次临床预约,涉及 4 名接受过 fellowship 培训的鼻科医生。92%的患者按时就诊,8%的患者失约。患者性别、就诊季节、就诊时间(上午 vs 下午)、就诊类型、医生性别、医生所在地或医生经验(<10 年 vs ≥10 年)与患者就诊情况无关。单因素分析显示,患者年龄≤50 岁(P=0.001)和主要保险类型(P<0.001)与失约有关。以医疗补助为主要保险类型与诊所失约有关。多因素分析显示,年龄≤50 岁(OR 1.62,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.14-2.30),P=0.007,以及主要保险类型(医疗补助:OR 3.75 [95% CI 2.58-5.45],P<0.001)仍是失约的显著预测因素。
50 岁以下的患者和以医疗补助为主要保险类型的患者存在错过鼻科诊所预约的风险。作为一个亚专科,通过针对这一人群的干预措施来提高就诊率,可以提高及时提供护理和提高临床效率。