• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[超声骨水泥取出器在肿瘤翻修关节成形术中的应用临床结果]

[Clinical results of the use of ultrasonic bone cement extractor in revision arthroplasty in oncology].

作者信息

Sokolovsky A V, Sokolovsky V A, Aliev M D

出版信息

Vopr Onkol. 2016;62(6):848-856.

PMID:30695575
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate beneficial advantages of the ultrasonic method of bone cement removing in, compare with mechanical as well as to qualitatively improve the technology of bone cement removing in revision arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 55 patients with benign, primary and metastatic malignant tumors. From March 2014 to January 2016 there were performed 56 revisions. In 36 cases revisions were made using ultrasound system <<Oscar Ultrasonic 3", mechanically the cement mantle was removed in 20 cases. The quality control of bone cement extraction was carried out by endoscopic stand <>. The quality of stem fixation was evaluated radiologically.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up after surgery was 11.5 months. One patient had second revision after mechanical extraction of bone cement due to aseptic loosening. In the group of patients after ultrasonic extraction of the cement mantle deterioration of the cement fixation was not revealed. The average time.of surgery using ultrasonical and mechanical technology of bone cement removal was 154.5 and 158.1 min. in replacement of one stem, 200 and 182 min. in replacement of two stems respectively. The average blood loss was 427 and 430 ml. in a time of one stem revision, 445 and 525 ml in a time of two stem revision after using ultrasound and mechanical technol- ogy respectively. In one stem revision with using ultrasound extractor was achieved the reduction in blood loss at 10% and in two stem revision at 16%. There were no any complications in using ultrasonic extractor.

CONCLUSION

The use of ultrasonic technology in the re- vision arthroplasty can improve the quality of cement fixa- tion, reduce the amount of bleeding and severity of surgical treatment regardless of the surgery time, improve economic efficiency. Further enhancement of the ultrasonic method for cement mantle extraction has a potential to improve its effectiveness.

摘要

目的

研究骨水泥清除超声方法相较于机械方法的有益优势,并定性改进翻修关节成形术中骨水泥清除技术。

材料与方法

该研究纳入了55例患有良性、原发性和转移性恶性肿瘤的患者。2014年3月至2016年1月期间进行了56次翻修手术。36例使用“奥斯卡超声3型”超声系统进行翻修,20例通过机械方式清除骨水泥套。通过“史托斯”内镜支架对骨水泥提取进行质量控制。通过放射学评估假体柄固定质量。

结果

术后平均随访11.5个月。1例患者在机械清除骨水泥后因无菌性松动进行了二次翻修。在超声清除骨水泥套的患者组中,未发现骨水泥固定恶化情况。使用超声和机械技术清除骨水泥更换单个假体柄的平均手术时间分别为154.5分钟和158.1分钟,更换两个假体柄时分别为200分钟和182分钟。使用超声和机械技术进行单个假体柄翻修时平均失血量分别为427毫升和430毫升,两个假体柄翻修时分别为445毫升和525毫升。使用超声提取器进行单个假体柄翻修时失血量减少了10%,两个假体柄翻修时减少了16%。使用超声提取器未出现任何并发症。

结论

在翻修关节成形术中使用超声技术可提高骨水泥固定质量,减少出血量和手术治疗的严重程度,且与手术时间无关,提高经济效益。进一步改进超声方法提取骨水泥套有可能提高其有效性。

相似文献

1
[Clinical results of the use of ultrasonic bone cement extractor in revision arthroplasty in oncology].[超声骨水泥取出器在肿瘤翻修关节成形术中的应用临床结果]
Vopr Onkol. 2016;62(6):848-856.
2
Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.股骨柄骨水泥型翻修术:瑞典髋关节置换登记处1179例初次翻修病例分析
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1222.R1.
3
[Cement-within-cement femoral stem reimplantation technique].[骨水泥型股骨柄再植入技术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(5):416-22.
4
[Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].[CF 30股骨柄早期无菌性松动]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):59-64.
5
Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.初次使用骨水泥技术行全髋关节置换术股骨侧翻修,不使用植骨。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun;95(4):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
6
Cement removal and bone bed preparation of the femoral medullary canal assisted by flexible endoscope in total hip revision arthroplasty.全髋关节翻修术中柔性内窥镜辅助下股骨骨髓腔骨水泥清除及骨床制备
J Orthop Sci. 2009 Nov;14(6):719-26. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1404-1. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
7
Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement used in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中使用抗生素骨水泥的成本效益分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91(3):634-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01029.
8
Cement extractor device in revision prosthesis of the humerus.肱骨翻修假体中的骨水泥取出装置。
Surg Technol Int. 2014 Nov;25:246-50.
9
Ultrasonic bone cement removal efficiency in total joint arthroplasty revision: A computer tomographic-based cadaver study.全膝关节置换翻修术中超声骨水泥清除效率:基于计算机断层扫描的尸体研究。
J Orthop Res. 2023 Jun;41(6):1365-1375. doi: 10.1002/jor.25465. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Revision total hip replacement using the cement-in-cement technique for the acetabular component: technique and results for 60 hips.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11):1482-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.29415.