Suppr超能文献

急性阑尾炎——使用RIPASA评分和非增强计算机断层扫描的新诊断算法

Acute appendicitis - new diagnostic algorithm using RIPASA score and non-contrast Computeed Tomography Scan.

作者信息

Davis George Neelankavil, Swaminathan Maithreyi

机构信息

Nevill Hall Hospital, Brecon Road, Abergavenny NP7 7EG.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Feb;69(Suppl 1)(1):S12-S16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and modified Alvarado scores with that of non-contrast computed tomography scan and ultrasound of abdomen and pelvis.

METHODS

The observational correlational study was conducted at Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, India, from April 1, 2014, to April 30, 2016, and comprised patients aged 18-60 years presenting with right lower quadrant pain to the emergency department. Modified Alvarado, RIPASA scores and ultrasound of abdomen and pelvis with optional non-contrast computed tomography scan reports were collected. Subjects underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, followed by histopathological analysis of specimen. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of diagnostic modalities in question were computed using SPSS 15.

RESULTS

Of the 206 patients, 126(61%) were males and 80(39%) were females. Overall mean mean age was 27.81±9.23 years. The diagnostic accuracy was 92.72% for RIPASA score and 59.22% for the modified Alvarado score. Ultrasound showed a high sensitivity of 94.65% but specificity of only 5.26%. Of the total, 25 patients underwent non-contrast computed tomography scan, and among them, 10(40%) were reported as cases of acute appendicitis. Diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast computed tomography scan was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Non-contrast computed tomography scan and RIPASA score were the most accurate diagnostic modalities..

摘要

目的

比较拉贾·伊斯特里·彭吉兰·安娜克·萨利哈阑尾炎(RIPASA)评分和改良阿尔瓦拉多评分与腹部和盆腔非增强计算机断层扫描及超声检查的准确性。

方法

2014年4月1日至2016年4月30日在印度班加罗尔的马尼帕尔医院进行了一项观察性相关性研究,纳入年龄在18至60岁之间因右下腹疼痛到急诊科就诊的患者。收集改良阿尔瓦拉多评分、RIPASA评分以及腹部和盆腔超声检查报告(可选择非增强计算机断层扫描报告)。受试者接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术,随后对标本进行组织病理学分析。使用SPSS 15计算所涉诊断方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。

结果

206例患者中,126例(61%)为男性,80例(39%)为女性。总体平均年龄为27.81±9.23岁。RIPASA评分的诊断准确性为92.72%,改良阿尔瓦拉多评分为59.22%。超声检查显示敏感性高,为94.65%,但特异性仅为5.26%。总共有25例患者接受了非增强计算机断层扫描,其中10例(40%)被报告为急性阑尾炎病例。非增强计算机断层扫描的诊断准确性为100%。

结论

非增强计算机断层扫描和RIPASA评分是最准确的诊断方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验