Kantorski Luciane Prado, Cardano Mario
Faculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Pelotas. R. Gomes Carneiro 1, Centro. 96010-610 Pelotas RS Brasil.
Dipartimento di Culture, Politica e Società, Università degli Studi di Torino. Torino Piemonte Itália.
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Jan;24(1):229-246. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018241.32232016.
The Open Dialogue Method was developed in Finland in order to deal with severe psychotic crises using dialogue and social network inclusion. By means of a review of the literature on the Open Dialogue Method, this article sought to identify the principles and contributions for deinstitutionalization.The PubMed (365), PsycInfo (134), Lilacs (no articles found) databases and 2 books were consulted. Thirty-four publications that fulfilled the requirements of this review were selected. The search was conducted in October 2015. The key words used were: open dialogue, crisis, first psychotic episode, schizophrenia, family therapy, need-adapted approach.
There were 3 reviews, 5 theoretical studies, 21 qualitative studies and 5 quantitative studies. Two of them were written in Italian, one in French and thirty-one in English. The authors were from Norway, the United States, Finland, Australia, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Canada and Poland. The publications were grouped for purposes of analysis into the following categories: Open Dialogue concepts and principles; Open Dialogue contributions; Challenges for Open Dialogue implementation in other countries, realities and contexts.
开放对话法是在芬兰发展起来的，旨在通过对话和融入社会网络来应对严重的精神病危机。通过对开放对话法相关文献的综述，本文试图确定去机构化的原则和贡献。查阅了PubMed（365篇）、PsycInfo（134篇）、Lilacs（未找到相关文章）数据库以及两本书籍。筛选出34篇符合本综述要求的出版物。检索于2015年10月进行。使用的关键词为：开放对话、危机、首次精神病发作、精神分裂症、家庭治疗、按需调整方法。
有3篇综述、5篇理论研究、21篇定性研究和5篇定量研究。其中2篇用意大利语撰写，1篇用法语撰写，31篇用英语撰写。作者来自挪威、美国、芬兰、澳大利亚、英国、比利时、加拿大和波兰。为便于分析，将这些出版物分为以下几类：开放对话的概念和原则；开放对话的贡献；在其他国家实施开放对话面临的挑战、实际情况和背景。
