• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划性剖宫产无医学指征的产妇近期并发症:基于登记的研究。

Maternal short-term complications after planned cesarean delivery without medical indication: A registry-based study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):905-912. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13549. Epub 2019 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.13549
PMID:30698280
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare short-term maternal outcomes in healthy primiparous women with uncomplicated pregnancies who delivered a singleton child at term by planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nationwide population-based cohort study of 145 821 low-risk primiparous women with healthy singletons in cephalic position in Denmark, 2008-2016. Data from the Medical Birth Register and the Danish National Patient Registry were linked and compared according to planned mode of delivery. Main outcome measures were major morbidity including maternal death, cardiac arrest, hysterectomy and thromboembolic disease. Minor maternal morbidity includes wound infection, postpartum fever, wound rupture and reoperation, bladder lesions, spinal headache and Ogilvie syndrome. Additionally, anal sphincter injuries were registered.

RESULTS

The study included 141 782 planned vaginal deliveries and 4039 planned cesarean deliveries. Severe maternal complications occurred in fewer than 1/4000 in both categories. Women with planned cesarean had a slightly higher risk of wound infections (0.17% vs 0.07%; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the remaining minor and major outcomes. Women with planned vaginal delivery had a 4.97% risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

For healthy primiparous women, both planned vaginal delivery and planned cesarean delivery are highly safe procedures when the short-term maternal outcome is taken into account. Planned cesarean delivery is associated with a slightly increased risk of wound infection compared with planned vaginal delivery. Women with planned vaginal delivery had a 4.97% risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在比较无并发症妊娠且足月单胎头位的健康初产妇,通过计划性剖宫产或计划性阴道分娩分娩的短期母婴结局。

材料与方法

这是一项在丹麦进行的全国性基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 2008 年至 2016 年间的 145821 名低危初产妇,且其均为健康的头位单胎。数据来自丹麦的医疗出生登记和丹麦国家患者登记处,根据计划分娩方式进行了链接和比较。主要结局指标包括主要发病率,包括产妇死亡、心脏骤停、子宫切除术和血栓栓塞疾病。次要产妇发病率包括伤口感染、产后发热、伤口破裂和再次手术、膀胱损伤、脊椎头痛和奥吉尔维氏综合征。此外,还登记了肛门括约肌损伤。

结果

本研究包括 141782 例计划性阴道分娩和 4039 例计划性剖宫产。两种情况下严重的产妇并发症发生率均低于 1/4000。计划性剖宫产的妇女伤口感染的风险略高(0.17% vs 0.07%;P=0.04)。其余的次要和主要结局无显著差异。计划阴道分娩的妇女发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险为 4.97%。

结论

考虑短期母婴结局,对于健康的初产妇,计划性阴道分娩和计划性剖宫产均是非常安全的分娩方式。与计划性阴道分娩相比,计划性剖宫产与伤口感染风险增加略相关。计划阴道分娩的妇女发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险为 4.97%。

相似文献

1
Maternal short-term complications after planned cesarean delivery without medical indication: A registry-based study.计划性剖宫产无医学指征的产妇近期并发症:基于登记的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):905-912. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13549. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
2
Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.是否选择剖宫产?产妇年龄与足月时不良结局风险:一项基于人群的低风险初产妇登记研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3.
3
Elective cesarean delivery for term breech.足月臀位选择性剖宫产。
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;101(4):690-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)03073-9.
4
Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.足月时低风险计划剖宫产与计划阴道分娩相关的孕产妇死亡率和严重发病率。
CMAJ. 2007 Feb 13;176(4):455-60. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060870.
5
Planned cesarean section vs planned vaginal delivery among women without formal medical indication for planned cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study of maternal short-term complications.无计划性剖宫产医学指证的孕妇行计划性剖宫产与计划性阴道分娩的短期母婴结局比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Sep;101(9):1026-1032. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14408. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
Effect of Planned Mode of Delivery in Women with Advanced Maternal Age.高龄孕产妇计划分娩方式的影响
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(11):2318-2327. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2055-4.
7
Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.丹麦产科医生对产妇要求下选择性剖宫产的个人偏好和总体态度:一项全国性邮寄调查。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Mar;83(3):262-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.0312.x.
8
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.三胎妊娠中尝试经阴道分娩与计划剖宫产的母婴结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):493.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.054. Epub 2016 May 7.
9
Planned vaginal delivery and cardiovascular morbidity in pregnant women with heart disease.计划分娩与心脏病孕妇的心血管发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;222(1):77.e1-77.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
10
[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Maternal Benefits and Risks of Planned Cesarean Delivery compared to Planned Vaginal Delivery].[臀先露:CNGOF临床实践指南——计划性剖宫产与计划性阴道分娩对母体的益处和风险]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Jan;48(1):109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.10.018. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-versus double-layer uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery and risk of uterine scar niche: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.剖宫产时单层与双层子宫缝合及子宫瘢痕憩室风险:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08151-y.
2
Evidence-Based Strategies to Minimize Unnecessary Primary Cesarean Sections: A Comprehensive Review.尽量减少不必要的剖宫产的循证策略:全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 29;16(11):e74729. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74729. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Comparing Cesarean Scar Defect Incidence After Locked and Unlocked Repair Methods Among Primiparous Patients: A Randomized Double-Blinded Trial.
初产妇中锁定与非锁定修复方法后剖宫产瘢痕缺损发生率的比较:一项随机双盲试验
J Family Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;18(3):146-153. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v18i3.16655.
4
Influence of Cesarean Section Scar on the Mean Pulsatility Index of the Uterine Artery Doppler between 20 and 34 Weeks of Gestation.剖宫产瘢痕对妊娠20至34周子宫动脉多普勒平均搏动指数的影响。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Jul 9;84(8):747-759. doi: 10.1055/a-2348-0083. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Maternal outcomes of planned mode of delivery for term breech in nulliparous women.足月初产妇计划性臀位分娩的母婴结局。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 3;19(4):e0297971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297971. eCollection 2024.
6
Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017.2017年丹麦国家患者登记处产科诊断和手术编码的验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 21;16:121-130. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S441123. eCollection 2024.
7
Breastfeeding among parous women offered home-visit by a midwife after early discharge following planned cesarean section: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.计划剖宫产术后早期出院的经产妇接受助产士家访后的母乳喂养情况:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
Eur J Midwifery. 2023 Dec 7;7:38. doi: 10.18332/ejm/173089. eCollection 2023.
8
Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.剖宫产术和子宫切除术时泌尿系统损伤的系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Feb;34(2):371-389. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05339-7. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
9
Surgical complications after caesarean section: A population-based cohort study.剖宫产术后手术并发症:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 5;16(10):e0258222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258222. eCollection 2021.
10
Cesarean delivery on maternal request and its influencing factors in Chongqing, China.中国重庆产妇要求剖宫产及其影响因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 19;21(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03866-7.