Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brain. 2019 Feb 1;142(2):443-459. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy319.
Frontotemporal dementia refers to a group of progressive neurodegenerative syndromes usually caused by the accumulation of pathological tau or TDP-43 proteins. The effects of these proteins in the brain are complex, and each can present with several different clinical syndromes. Clinical efficacy trials of drugs targeting these proteins must use endpoints that are meaningful to all participants despite the variability in symptoms across patients. There are many candidate clinical measures, including neuropsychological scores and functional measures. Brain imaging is another potentially attractive outcome that can be precisely quantified and provides evidence of disease modification. Most imaging studies in frontotemporal dementia have been cross-sectional, and few have compared longitudinal changes in cortical volume with changes in other measures such as perfusion and white matter integrity. The current study characterized longitudinal changes in 161 patients with three frontotemporal dementia syndromes: behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (n = 77) and the semantic (n = 45) and non-fluent (n = 39) variants of primary progressive aphasia. Visits included comprehensive neuropsychological and functional assessment, structural MRI (3 T), diffusion tensor imaging, and arterial spin labelled perfusion imaging. The goal was to identify measures that are appropriate as clinical trial outcomes for each group, as well as those that might be appropriate for trials that would include more than one of these groups. Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate changes in each measure, and to examine the correlation between imaging and clinical changes. Sample sizes were estimated based on the observed effects for theoretical clinical trials using bootstrapping techniques to provide 95% confidence intervals for these estimates. Declines in functional and neuropsychological measures, as well as frontal and temporal cortical volumes and white matter microstructure were detected in all groups. Imaging changes were statistically significantly correlated with, and explained a substantial portion of variance in, the change in most clinical measures. Perfusion and diffusion tensor imaging accounted for variation in clinical decline beyond volume alone. Sample size estimates for atrophy and diffusion imaging were comparable to clinical measures. Corpus callosal fractional anisotropy led to the lowest sample size estimates for all three syndromes. These findings provide further guidance on selection of trial endpoints for studies in frontotemporal dementia and support the use of neuroimaging, particularly structural and diffusion weighted imaging, as biomarkers. Diffusion and perfusion imaging appear to offer additional utility for explaining clinical change beyond the variance explained by volume alone, arguing for considering multimodal imaging in treatment trials.
额颞叶痴呆是一组进行性神经退行性综合征,通常由病理性 tau 或 TDP-43 蛋白的积累引起。这些蛋白质在大脑中的作用复杂,每种蛋白质都可以表现出几种不同的临床综合征。针对这些蛋白质的药物临床疗效试验必须使用对所有参与者都有意义的终点,尽管患者之间的症状存在差异。有许多候选的临床指标,包括神经心理学评分和功能指标。脑成像也是另一种有吸引力的潜在结果,可以进行精确量化,并提供疾病修饰的证据。额颞叶痴呆的大多数影像学研究都是横断面研究,很少有研究比较皮质体积的纵向变化与灌注和白质完整性等其他指标的变化。本研究描述了三种额颞叶痴呆综合征 161 例患者的纵向变化:行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(n=77)和原发性进行性失语症的语义(n=45)和非流利(n=39)变体。就诊包括全面的神经心理学和功能评估、结构磁共振成像(3T)、扩散张量成像和动脉自旋标记灌注成像。目标是确定每个组作为临床试验结果的适当指标,以及那些可能适用于包括这些组中的多个组的试验的指标。线性混合效应模型用于估计每个指标的变化,并检查成像和临床变化之间的相关性。根据使用自举技术的理论临床试验的观察效果,估计样本量,为这些估计值提供 95%置信区间。所有组均检测到功能和神经心理学指标以及额颞皮质体积和白质微观结构的下降。成像变化与大多数临床指标的变化在统计学上显著相关,并解释了大部分临床指标变化的很大一部分。灌注和扩散张量成像解释了单独体积以外的临床下降的变化。萎缩和扩散成像的样本量估计与临床指标相当。胼胝体分数各向异性导致所有三种综合征的最低样本量估计。这些发现为额颞叶痴呆研究中试验终点的选择提供了进一步的指导,并支持使用神经影像学,特别是结构和扩散加权成像作为生物标志物。扩散和灌注成像似乎在单独体积解释的方差之外提供了额外的临床变化解释的效用,这表明在治疗试验中考虑多模态成像。