• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体在粗糙度评价精细和粗糙纹理时的认知加工差异。

Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.

机构信息

Nagoya Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya, Japan.

JST, PRESTO, Kawaguchi, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0211407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211407. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211407
PMID:30699197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6353187/
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that skin vibration is an important factor affecting the roughness perception of fine textures. For coarse textures, the determining physical factor is much less clear and there are indications that this might be participant-dependent. In this paper, we focused on roughness perception of both coarse and fine textures of different materials (glass particle surfaces and sandpapers). We investigated the relationship between subjective roughness ratings and three physical parameters (skin vibration, friction coefficient, and particle size) within a group of 30 participants. Results of the glass particle surfaces showed both spatial information (particle size) and temporal information (skin vibration) had a high correlation with subjective roughness ratings. The former correlation was slightly but significantly higher than the latter. The results also indicated different weights of temporal information and spatial information for roughness ratings among participants. Roughness ratings of a different material (sandpaper versus glass particles) could be either larger, similar or smaller, indicating differences among individuals. The best way to describe our results is that in their perceptual evaluation of roughness, different individuals weight temporal information, spatial information, and other mechanical properties differently.

摘要

先前的研究表明,皮肤振动是影响精细纹理粗糙度感知的一个重要因素。对于粗糙纹理,决定性的物理因素则不太明确,有迹象表明这可能与参与者有关。在本文中,我们专注于不同材料(玻璃颗粒表面和砂纸)的粗糙和精细纹理的粗糙度感知。我们在 30 名参与者组成的小组中研究了主观粗糙度评分与三个物理参数(皮肤振动、摩擦系数和颗粒大小)之间的关系。玻璃颗粒表面的结果表明,空间信息(颗粒大小)和时间信息(皮肤振动)与主观粗糙度评分高度相关。前者的相关性略高于后者。结果还表明,参与者对粗糙度评分的时间信息和空间信息的权重不同。不同材料(砂纸与玻璃颗粒)的粗糙度评分可能更大、相似或更小,这表明个体之间存在差异。描述我们结果的最佳方式是,在他们对粗糙度的感知评估中,不同个体对时间信息、空间信息和其他机械特性的权重不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/c0af9bd4f4e4/pone.0211407.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/346074a7644f/pone.0211407.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/95e17af50dad/pone.0211407.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/75ba32421d2f/pone.0211407.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/559364e276f2/pone.0211407.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/a227d99738e9/pone.0211407.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/c0af9bd4f4e4/pone.0211407.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/346074a7644f/pone.0211407.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/95e17af50dad/pone.0211407.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/75ba32421d2f/pone.0211407.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/559364e276f2/pone.0211407.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/a227d99738e9/pone.0211407.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/6353187/c0af9bd4f4e4/pone.0211407.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.个体在粗糙度评价精细和粗糙纹理时的认知加工差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0211407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211407. eCollection 2019.
2
Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces.随机粗糙表面的触觉感知。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 25;10(1):15800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72890-y.
3
Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures.空间和时间代码介导对自然纹理的触觉感知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 15;110(42):17107-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305509110. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
4
Tactile perception of the roughness of 3D-printed textures.对3D打印纹理粗糙度的触觉感知。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Mar 1;119(3):862-876. doi: 10.1152/jn.00564.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Physical and Perceptual Independence of Ultrasonic Vibration and Electrovibration for Friction Modulation.用于摩擦调制的超声振动和电振动的物理及感知独立性
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2015 Apr-Jun;8(2):235-9. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2015.2430353. Epub 2015 May 6.
6
The finishing touches: the role of friction and roughness in haptic perception of surface coatings.最后的修饰:摩擦和粗糙度在表面涂层触觉感知中的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jun;238(6):1511-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05831-w. Epub 2020 May 23.
7
Tactile roughness discrimination of the finger pad relies primarily on vibration sensitive afferents not necessarily located in the hand.手指垫的触觉粗糙度辨别主要依赖于振动敏感传入神经,而这些传入神经不一定位于手部。
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Apr 1;229(1):273-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
8
Roughness of simulated surfaces examined with a haptic tool: effects of spatial period, friction, and resistance amplitude.使用触觉工具检测模拟表面的粗糙度:空间周期、摩擦和阻力幅度的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;202(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2105-x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
9
Tactile Roughness Perception of Virtual Gratings by Electrovibration.电振动刺激下虚拟光栅的触觉粗糙度感知
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2020 Jul-Sep;13(3):562-570. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2959993. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
Tactile Perception of Virtual Edges and Gratings Displayed by Friction Modulation via Ultrasonic Actuation.通过超声致动的摩擦调制显示的虚拟边缘和光栅的触觉感知。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2020 Apr-Jun;13(2):368-379. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2949411. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Global surface features contribute to human haptic roughness estimations.全球表面特征有助于人类触觉粗糙度估计。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Mar;240(3):773-789. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06289-0. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
2
Physical origin of a complicated tactile sensation: ' feel'.一种复杂触觉感受“感觉”的物理起源。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jul 10;6(7):190039. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190039. eCollection 2019 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: further evidence of an opponent process in the sense of touch.凸点图案触觉纹理的感知:触觉中对立过程的进一步证据。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2018 Jun;35(2):59-68. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2018.1460262. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
2
The neural code for tactile roughness in the somatosensory nerves.躯体感觉神经中触觉粗糙度的神经编码。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Dec 1;118(6):3107-3117. doi: 10.1152/jn.00374.2017. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
A Variation Code Accounts for the Perceived Roughness of Coarsely Textured Surfaces.
一种变异编码解释了粗糙纹理表面的感知粗糙度。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 25;7:46699. doi: 10.1038/srep46699.
4
Effect of skin-transmitted vibration enhancement on vibrotactile perception.经皮肤传递的振动增强对振动触觉感知的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jun;233(6):1721-31. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4246-4. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
Psychophysical dimensions of tactile perception of textures.质地触觉感知的心理物理学维度。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2013 Jan-Mar;6(1):81-93. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2012.32.
6
Natural scenes in tactile texture.触觉纹理中的自然场景。
J Neurophysiol. 2014 May;111(9):1792-802. doi: 10.1152/jn.00680.2013. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
7
Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures.空间和时间代码介导对自然纹理的触觉感知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 15;110(42):17107-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305509110. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
8
Roughness perception in tactile channels: evidence for an opponent process in the sense of touch.触觉通道中的粗糙度感知:触觉中对立过程的证据。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2013 Sep;30(3):120-32. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2013.779242. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
9
Texture-induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration.触觉探索过程中前臂的纹理诱发振动。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jul 6;6:37. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00037. eCollection 2012.
10
Tactile roughness discrimination of the finger pad relies primarily on vibration sensitive afferents not necessarily located in the hand.手指垫的触觉粗糙度辨别主要依赖于振动敏感传入神经,而这些传入神经不一定位于手部。
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Apr 1;229(1):273-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Jan 17.