• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧与单根胸廓内动脉桥在 10 年时的比较。

Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years.

机构信息

From the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital (D.P.T., B.L.), the Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Botnar Research Centre (S.G., D.G.A.), and the Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health (A.M.G.), University of Oxford, Oxford, the School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, and Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol (U.B.), the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (V.Z.), Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge (C.C., C.S.), the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle (S.C.), the Department of Cardiac Surgery, King's College Hospital (J.D.), and Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London (J. Pepper), London, the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Manchester (R.H.), the Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff (P.O.), the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Sussex County, Brighton (U.T.), and Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, and Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich (M.F.) - all in the United Kingdom; the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital (M.G.), and Mount Sinai St. Luke's (J. Puskas) - both in New York; the Center for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland (A.B.), and the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Silesia (M.D., S.W.), Katowice, and the Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw (M.J.) - all in Poland; the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.B., S.S.); and the Heart Institute of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil (F.M.).

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):437-446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808783.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1808783
PMID:30699314
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple arterial grafts may result in longer survival than single arterial grafts after coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. We evaluated the use of bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafts for CABG.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients scheduled for CABG to undergo bilateral or single internal-thoracic-artery grafting. Additional arterial or vein grafts were used as indicated. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 10 years. The composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 1548 patients were randomly assigned to undergo bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the bilateral-graft group) and 1554 to undergo single internal-thoracic-artery grafting (the single-graft group). In the bilateral-graft group, 13.9% of the patients received only a single internal-thoracic-artery graft, and in the single-graft group, 21.8% of the patients also received a radial-artery graft. Vital status was not known for 2.3% of the patients at 10 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis at 10 years, there were 315 deaths (20.3% of the patients) in the bilateral-graft group and 329 deaths (21.2%) in the single-graft group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.12; P=0.62). Regarding the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, there were 385 patients (24.9%) with an event in the bilateral-graft group and 425 patients (27.3%) with an event in the single-graft group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who were scheduled for CABG and had been randomly assigned to undergo bilateral or single internal-thoracic-artery grafting, there was no significant between-group difference in the rate of death from any cause at 10 years in the intention-to-treat analysis. Further studies are needed to determine whether multiple arterial grafts provide better outcomes than a single internal-thoracic-artery graft. (Funded by the British Heath Foundation and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN46552265 .).

摘要

背景

在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后,使用多支动脉移植物可能比单支动脉移植物的存活率更高。我们评估了双侧内乳动脉用于 CABG 的效果。

方法

我们将接受 CABG 的患者随机分为双侧或单侧内乳动脉移植组。根据需要使用其他动脉或静脉移植物。主要结局是 10 年内任何原因导致的死亡。次要结局是任何原因导致的死亡、心肌梗死或中风的复合结局。

结果

共有 1548 名患者被随机分为双侧内乳动脉移植组(双侧移植组)和 1554 名患者分为单侧内乳动脉移植组(单侧移植组)。在双侧移植组中,有 13.9%的患者仅接受了单支内乳动脉移植,而在单侧移植组中,有 21.8%的患者还接受了桡动脉移植。10 年后,有 2.3%的患者无法确定其生存状况。在 10 年的意向治疗分析中,双侧移植组有 315 例死亡(患者的 20.3%),单侧移植组有 329 例死亡(患者的 21.2%)(风险比,0.96;95%置信区间[CI],0.82 至 1.12;P=0.62)。关于死亡、心肌梗死或中风的复合结局,在双侧移植组中有 385 例(24.9%)患者发生事件,在单侧移植组中有 425 例(27.3%)患者发生事件(风险比,0.90;95%CI,0.79 至 1.03)。

结论

在接受 CABG 并被随机分为双侧或单侧内乳动脉移植组的患者中,意向治疗分析中 10 年时全因死亡率无显著组间差异。需要进一步的研究来确定多支动脉移植物是否比单支内乳动脉移植物提供更好的结局。(由英国卫生基金会和其他机构资助;当前对照试验编号,ISRCTN46552265)。

相似文献

1
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years.双侧与单根胸廓内动脉桥在 10 年时的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):437-446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808783.
2
Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.随机对照试验:双侧与单侧胸廓内动脉桥血管移植的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2540-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
3
Outcomes following surgical revascularization with single versus bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the EXCEL trial†.左主干冠状动脉疾病患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术时,单支与双侧胸廓内动脉桥的外科血运重建效果:EXCEL 试验的见解†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;55(3):501-510. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy291.
4
5
Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts with concomitant saphenous vein grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on mortality and event-free survival.单支与双支胸廓内动脉移植物联合大隐静脉移植物用于多支冠状动脉旁路移植术:对死亡率和无事件生存率的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 May;127(5):1408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.10.006.
6
Outcomes associated with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: the importance of age.双侧内乳动脉移植术的结果:年龄的重要性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;92(4):1269-75; discussion 1275-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.083.
7
The Incremental Value of Three or More Arterial Grafts in CABG: The Effect of Native Vessel Disease.三支及以上动脉桥在 CABG 中的增量价值:自身血管病变的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct;106(4):1071-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.088. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
8
Multiple Arterial Grafting Is Associated With Better Outcomes for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients.多支动脉搭桥术与冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的更好结局相关。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(19):2081-2090. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034464.
9
Equipoise between radial artery and right internal thoracic artery as the second arterial conduit in left internal thoracic artery-based coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a multi-institutional study†.在基于左胸廓内动脉的冠状动脉搭桥手术中,桡动脉与右胸廓内动脉作为第二动脉桥的 equipoise:一项多机构研究† 。 (注:“equipoise”在医学语境中可能有特定含义,这里直接保留英文未译,需结合专业知识进一步理解其确切所指)
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):188-95. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv093. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
10
Left internal thoracic artery composite grafting with the right internal thoracic versus radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术中左乳内动脉复合移植采用右乳内动脉与桡动脉的比较。
J Card Surg. 2011 Nov;26(6):579-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01314.x. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Fabrication and characterization of electrospun polycaprolactone/ derived-ECM composite scaffolds for small-diameter vascular grafts.用于小口径血管移植物的电纺聚己内酯/衍生细胞外基质复合支架的制备与表征
RSC Adv. 2025 Aug 29;15(38):31060-31075. doi: 10.1039/d5ra04406e.
2
Impact of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in patients with mildly decreased renal function.双侧乳内动脉移植对轻度肾功能减退患者的影响。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s11748-025-02184-5.
3
Vascular (dys)function in the failing heart.
衰竭心脏中的血管(功能失调)功能
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Jun 22. doi: 10.1038/s41569-025-01163-w.
4
Comparison of multiple arterial grafts vs. single arterial graft in coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉搭桥手术中多支动脉移植物与单支动脉移植物的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 27;12:1555242. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555242. eCollection 2025.
5
Survival Outcomes After Multiple vs Single Arterial Grafting Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低患者多次与单次动脉移植后的生存结局
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254508. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4508.
6
One-year patency rates of saphenous vein grafts harvested using the no-touch technique in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术中采用非接触技术获取的大隐静脉移植血管的1年通畅率。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2025 Feb 28;15(1):50-60. doi: 10.21037/cdt-24-295. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
7
Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes of 597 Patients Following Minimally Invasive Multi-Vessel Coronary Off-Pump Bypass Surgery.597例患者微创多支冠状动脉非体外循环搭桥手术后的中长期结局
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 3;14(5):1707. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051707.
8
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior minithoracotomy: Setup, results, and evolution of a new surgical procedure.经左前小切口微创冠状动脉旁路移植术:一种新手术方法的设置、结果及进展
JTCVS Tech. 2024 Nov 13;29:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.10.022. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
The Saphenous Vein Graft: Can a Frog Become a Princess?大隐静脉移植物:青蛙能变成公主吗?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 21;60(12):1915. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121915.
10
'No-touch' or 'soft-touch' vein graft harvesting for CABG.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的“非接触式”或“轻柔接触式”静脉移植物获取
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;41(1):4-6. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01846-y. Epub 2024 Nov 5.