• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物机械导管溶栓治疗急性股腘静脉血栓形成:分层随机试验分析。

Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Acute Femoral-Popliteal Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis from a Stratified Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2019 Apr;119(4):633-644. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677795. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1677795
PMID:30699446
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) trial reported that pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) did not reduce post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), but reduced moderate-to-severe PTS and the severity of PTS symptoms. In this analysis, we examine the effect of PCDT in patients with femoral-popliteal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (without involvement of more proximal veins).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within the ATTRACT trial, 300 patients had DVT involving the femoral vein without involvement of the common femoral or iliac veins and were randomized to receive PCDT with anticoagulation or anticoagulation alone (no PCDT). Patients were followed for 24 months.

RESULTS

From 6 to 24 months, between the PCDT versus no PCDT arms, there was: no difference in any PTS (Villalta scale ≥ 5: risk ratio [RR] = 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.24); moderate-or-severe PTS (Villalta scale ≥ 10: RR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.57-1.52); severity of PTS scores; or general or disease-specific quality of life ( > 0.5 for all comparisons). From baseline to both 10 and 30 days, there was no difference in improvement of leg pain or swelling between treatment arms. From baseline to 10 days, major bleeding occurred in three versus none ( = 0.06) and any bleeding occurred in eight versus two ( = 0.032) PCDT versus no PCDT patients. Over 24 months, recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 16 PCDT and 12 no PCDT patients ( = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

In patients with femoral-popliteal DVT, PCDT did not improve short- or long-term efficacy outcomes, but it increased bleeding. Therefore, PCDT should not be used as initial treatment of femoral-popliteal DVT. (NCT00790335).

摘要

背景与目的

急性静脉血栓形成:血栓切除术联合辅助导管定向溶栓(ATTRACT)试验报告称,药物机械性导管定向溶栓(PCDT)并未降低血栓后综合征(PTS),但可减轻中重度 PTS 并减轻 PTS 症状的严重程度。在本分析中,我们研究了 PCDT 在股腘深静脉血栓形成(DVT)(不伴有更近端静脉受累)患者中的作用。

患者与方法

在 ATTRACT 试验中,300 例患者患有股静脉 DVT,不伴有股总或髂静脉受累,随机分为接受 PCDT 联合抗凝治疗或单独抗凝治疗(无 PCDT)。患者随访 24 个月。

结果

从 6 至 24 个月,PCDT 与无 PCDT 组之间:任何 PTS(Villalta 量表≥5:风险比 [RR] = 0.97;95%置信区间 [CI],0.75-1.24)均无差异;中重度 PTS(Villalta 量表≥10:RR = 0.93;95% CI,0.57-1.52);PTS 评分严重程度;或一般或疾病特异性生活质量(所有比较均>0.5)。从基线到治疗后 10 天和 30 天,治疗组之间腿部疼痛或肿胀的改善无差异。从基线到 10 天,3 例患者发生大出血,无患者发生大出血( = 0.06),8 例患者发生任何出血,无患者发生出血( = 0.032)。在 24 个月期间,16 例 PCDT 患者和 12 例无 PCDT 患者发生复发性静脉血栓栓塞症( = 0.24)。

结论

在股腘 DVT 患者中,PCDT 并未改善短期或长期疗效结局,但增加了出血风险。因此,PCDT 不应作为股腘 DVT 的初始治疗方法。(NCT00790335)

相似文献

1
Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Acute Femoral-Popliteal Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis from a Stratified Randomized Trial.药物机械导管溶栓治疗急性股腘静脉血栓形成:分层随机试验分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Apr;119(4):633-644. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677795. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
2
Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.急性髂股静脉血栓形成的血管内血栓切除术。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 26;139(9):1162-1173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037425.
3
Predictors of Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Trial.经导管药物溶栓治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成的临床转归预测因素:多中心随机试验分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):1161-1170.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.05.030. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
4
Correlation between Post-Procedure Residual Thrombus and Clinical Outcome in Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Receiving Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.多中心随机试验中接受药物机械溶栓治疗的深静脉血栓形成患者术后残余血栓与临床结局的相关性
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1517-1528.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Quality of life after pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for proximal deep venous thrombosis.经导管药物溶栓治疗近端深静脉血栓形成后的生活质量。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Jan;8(1):8-23.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.023.
6
Relationships between the use of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis, sonographic findings, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute proximal DVT: Results from the ATTRACT Multicenter Randomized Trial.急性近端深静脉血栓形成患者应用药物机械性导管溶栓、超声表现与临床结局的关系:来自 ATTRACT 多中心随机试验的结果。
Vasc Med. 2019 Oct;24(5):442-451. doi: 10.1177/1358863X19862043. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
7
Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for pregnancy-related iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.药物机械性导管定向溶栓治疗妊娠相关髂股静脉深静脉血栓形成
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Jul;26(7):992-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Standard Anticoagulation in Patients With Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis: Results From the ATTRACT Trial.近端深静脉血栓形成患者中,药物机械性导管定向溶栓与标准抗凝治疗的成本效益:ATTRACT试验结果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Oct;12(10):e005659. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005659. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
9
AngioJet Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter Directed Thrombolysis vs. Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Alone for the Treatment of Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.AngioJet 机械血栓切除术与导管溶栓联合治疗与单独导管溶栓治疗髂股静脉血栓形成的疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;60(4):578-585. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
10
Pharmacomechanical catheter thrombolysis for pregnancy-related proximal deep venous thrombosis: prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome.药物机械导管溶栓治疗妊娠相关的近端深静脉血栓形成:预防血栓后综合征。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 May;34(9):1441-1447. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1638900. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a machine learning model based on multiple kernel for predicting the recurrence risk of Budd-Chiari syndrome.基于多核的机器学习模型用于预测布加综合征复发风险的开发与验证
Front Physiol. 2025 May 30;16:1589469. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1589469. eCollection 2025.
2
Angioplasty or stenting for deep venous thrombosis.血管成形术或支架置入术治疗深静脉血栓形成。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 19;2(2):CD011468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011468.pub2.
3
Guidelines on deep vein thrombosis of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.
巴西血管病学和血管外科学会深静脉血栓形成指南。
J Vasc Bras. 2024 Sep 3;23:e20230107. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202301072. eCollection 2024.
4
Three-Year Outcomes, Risk Factors for Restenosis After Stenting for DVT Combined with Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome.静脉血栓形成合并髂静脉压迫综合征支架置入后再狭窄的 3 年结果及危险因素。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241283821. doi: 10.1177/10760296241283821.
5
Safety and Effectiveness of Mechanical Thrombectomy From the Fully Enrolled Multicenter, Prospective CLOUT Registry.来自完全入组的多中心前瞻性CLOUT注册研究的机械取栓术的安全性和有效性
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Feb 23;2(2):100585. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100585. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
6
Current Evidence for Endovascular Therapies in the Management of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis.急性深静脉血栓形成管理中血管内治疗的当前证据
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):1571-1579. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03784-z. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
7
Comparison of anticoagulation vs mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.比较抗凝治疗与机械取栓治疗髂股静脉深静脉血栓。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101825. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101825. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
8
TILE pilot trial study protocol: Tinzaparin Lead-in to Prevent the Post-Thrombotic syndrome study protocol.TILE 试验研究方案:丁肝素导入以预防血栓后综合征研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 31;13(10):e064715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064715.
9
Current challenges in the prevention and management of post-thrombotic syndrome-towards improved prevention.当前血栓后综合征预防和管理的挑战——向更好的预防迈进。
Int J Hematol. 2023 Nov;118(5):547-567. doi: 10.1007/s12185-023-03651-6. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
10
Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.导管溶栓与 AngioJet 机械溶栓导管治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101669. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 23.