Suppr超能文献

胸椎旁神经阻滞导管用于术后患者自控镇痛时程控间歇推注与持续输注的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。

Comparison of programmed intermittent bolus infusion and continuous infusion for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with thoracic paravertebral block catheter: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb;44(2):240-245. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000031. Epub 2019 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In this randomized, double-blind, controlled study, we hypothesized that programmed intermittent bolus infusion (PIBI) of local anesthetic for continuous paravertebral block (PVB), combined with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), provided better pain control, better patient satisfaction, and decreased in local anesthetic consumption when compared with a continuous infusion (CI) combined with PCA, after video-assisted thoracoscopic unilateral lung resection surgery.

METHODS

Preoperatively, patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic unilateral lung resection surgery received ipsilateral paravertebral catheters inserted at the level of thoracic vertebrae 4 and 5. All the subjects received an initial bolus of 15 mL 0.375% ropivacaine via the catheters. Subjects were randomized to receive 0.2 % ropivacaine 8 mL/h as either PIBI (n=17) or CI (n=17) combined with a PCA pump. The pain scores, frequency of PCA, local anesthetic consumption, patient satisfaction, and the need for rescue analgesia with tramadol were recorded until 48 hours postoperative.

RESULTS

The numeric rating scale scores in the PIBI group were significantly lower than the CI group at 4, 8, 12 hours and 4, 8, 12, 24 hours postoperatively, at rest, and during coughing, respectively. PCA local anesthetic consumption (30 mg (20-60 mg) vs 120 mg (70-155 mg), p=0.000) and frequency of PCA use over 48 hours (3 (2-6) vs 12 (7-15.5), p=0.000) was lower in the PIBI group as compared with the CI group. Additionally, the PIBI group showed greater patient satisfaction. The need for tramadol rescue was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In PVBs, local anesthetic administered as a PIBI in conjunction with PCA provided superior postoperative analgesia to a CI combined with PCA in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic unilateral lung resection surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-IOR-17011253.

摘要

背景与目的

在这项随机、双盲、对照研究中,我们假设与患者自控镇痛(PCA)联合使用局部麻醉药的程控间歇性推注(PIBI)用于连续椎旁阻滞(PVB)与连续输注(CI)联合 PCA 相比,可为接受电视辅助胸腔镜单侧肺切除术的患者提供更好的疼痛控制、更高的患者满意度,并减少局部麻醉药的消耗。

方法

术前,接受电视辅助胸腔镜单侧肺切除术的患者在第 4 和第 5 胸椎水平插入同侧椎旁导管。所有患者均通过导管接受初始 15 mL 0.375%罗哌卡因推注。将患者随机分为两组,分别接受 0.2%罗哌卡因 8 mL/h 的 PIBI(n=17)或 CI(n=17)联合 PCA 泵。记录疼痛评分、PCA 泵使用频率、局部麻醉药消耗、患者满意度以及使用曲马多进行解救性镇痛的需求,直至术后 48 小时。

结果

PIBI 组的数字评分量表(NRS)评分在术后 4、8、12 小时和 4、8、12、24 小时静息时和咳嗽时均显著低于 CI 组。与 CI 组相比,PIBI 组 PCA 局部麻醉药消耗(30 mg(20-60 mg)比 120 mg(70-155 mg),p=0.000)和 48 小时内 PCA 泵使用频率(3 次(2-6 次)比 12 次(7-15.5 次),p=0.000)均较低。此外,PIBI 组患者满意度更高。两组需要曲马多解救的情况相似。

结论

在 PVB 中,与 CI 联合 PCA 相比,与 PCA 联合使用的程控间歇性推注局部麻醉药可提供更好的术后镇痛效果,用于接受电视辅助胸腔镜单侧肺切除术的患者。

临床试验注册

ChiCTR-IOR-17011253。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验