Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University.
Hunan Province Center for Clinical Anesthesia and Anesthesiology, Research Institute of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province.
Clin J Pain. 2022 Jun 1;38(6):410-417. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001037.
Continuous thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) connected with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump is an effective modality to reduce postoperative pain following thoracic surgery. For the PCA settings, the programmed intermittent bolus infusion (PIBI) and continuous infusion (CI) are commonly practiced. However, the comparative effectiveness between the 2 approaches has been inconsistent. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the optimal PCA settings to treat postthoracotomy pain by combing PIBI and CI together.
All enrolled patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery accepted ultrasound-guided TPVB catheterization before the surgery and then were randomly allocated in to 3 groups depending on different settings of the PCA pump connecting to the TPVB catheter: the PIBI+CI, PIBI, and CI groups. Numerical Rating Scales were evaluated for each patient at T1 (1 h after extubation), T2 (12 h after the surgery), T3 (24 h after the surgery), T4 (36 h after the surgery), and T5 (48 h after the surgery). Besides, the consumptions of PCA ropivacaine, the number of blocked dermatomes at T3, and the requirement for extra dezocine for pain relief among the 3 groups were also compared.
First, the Numerical Rating Scale scores in the PIBI+CI group were lower than the CI group at T2 and T3 (P<0.05) when patients were at rest and were also lower than the CI group at T2, T3, and T4 (P<0.01) and the PIBI group at T3 when patients were coughing (P<0.01). Second, the 2-day cumulative dosage of PCA in the PIBI+CI group was lower than both the CI and PIBI groups (P<0.01). Third, the number of blocked dermatomes in the PIBI and PIBI+CI groups were comparable and were both wider than the CI group at T3 (P<0.01). Finally, a smaller proportion (not statistically significant) of patients in the PIBI+CI group (5.26%, 2/38) had required dezocine for pain relief when compared with the PIBI group (19.44%, 7/36) and the CI group (15.79%, 6/38).
The combination of PIBI and CI provides superior analgesic modality to either PIBI or CI alone in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Therefore, it should be advocated to improve the management of postoperative pain, clinical outcomes, and ultimately patient satisfaction.
连续胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)与患者自控镇痛(PCA)泵相连是一种有效减少开胸手术后疼痛的方法。对于 PCA 设置,通常采用程控间歇推注(PIBI)和持续输注(CI)。然而,这两种方法的有效性一直不一致。因此,本研究的目的是通过将 PIBI 和 CI 相结合,探索治疗开胸术后疼痛的最佳 PCA 设置。
所有接受胸腔镜手术的患者在手术前接受超声引导下的 TPVB 导管置管,然后根据 PCA 泵与 TPVB 导管的不同连接方式随机分为 3 组:PIBI+CI 组、PIBI 组和 CI 组。在 T1(拔管后 1 小时)、T2(手术后 12 小时)、T3(手术后 24 小时)、T4(手术后 36 小时)和 T5(手术后 48 小时),对每位患者进行数字评分量表评估。此外,还比较了 3 组患者在 T3 时的 PCA 罗哌卡因消耗、阻滞皮区数量以及需要额外地佐辛缓解疼痛的情况。
首先,在休息时,PIBI+CI 组的数字评分量表评分低于 CI 组在 T2 和 T3 时(P<0.05),在 T2、T3 和 T4 时(P<0.01)和 PIBI 组在 T3 时(P<0.01)咳嗽时,评分也低于 CI 组。其次,PIBI+CI 组 2 天的 PCA 累积剂量低于 CI 组和 PIBI 组(P<0.01)。第三,PIBI 组和 PIBI+CI 组的阻滞皮区数量相当,在 T3 时均宽于 CI 组(P<0.01)。最后,与 PIBI 组(19.44%,7/36)和 CI 组(15.79%,6/38)相比,PIBI+CI 组(5.26%,2/38)需要地佐辛缓解疼痛的患者比例较小(无统计学意义)。
在接受胸腔镜手术的患者中,PIBI 和 CI 的联合应用比单独使用 PIBI 或 CI 提供了更好的镇痛效果。因此,应提倡改善术后疼痛管理、临床结局,最终提高患者满意度。