Suppr超能文献

类风湿性关节炎患者的足部矫形器:足病医生处方习惯调查

Foot orthoses for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a survey of prescription habits among podiatrists.

作者信息

Chapman Lara S, Redmond Anthony C, Landorf Karl B, Rome Keith, Keenan Anne-Maree, Waxman Robin, Alcacer-Pitarch Begonya, Siddle Heidi J, Backhouse Michael R

机构信息

1Department of Podiatry, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate District Hospital, Lancaster Park Road, Harrogate, UK.

2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 Jan 25;12:7. doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0314-5. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend foot orthoses for people with both early (< 2 years) and established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While prefabricated foot orthoses are cheaper and can exhibit comparable effects to customised devices, the available evidence for their effectiveness is inconsistent. Little is known about what types of foot orthoses clinicians prescribe. This study describes the foot orthoses prescription habits of podiatrists for people with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-three podiatrists from the United Kingdom (UK) ( = 88), Australia ( = 68) and New Zealand ( = 27) completed a self-administered, online survey regarding the types of foot orthoses prescribed in clinical practice for people with RA. This study forms part of a wider international survey exploring foot orthosis prescription habits.

RESULTS

UK respondents were more likely to prescribe prefabricated orthoses for early RA ( = 47, 53%) and customised orthoses for established RA (n = 47, 53%). Respondents in Australia were more likely to prescribe customised orthoses for both early ( = 32, 47%) and established ( = 46, 68%) RA, whilst respondents in New Zealand were more likely to prescribe prefabricated orthoses for both early ( = 16, 59%) and established ( = 10, 37%) disease.Irrespective of disease stage, the use of foam impression boxes was more prevalent in the UK and New Zealand when capturing a model of the feet prior to manufacturing customised orthoses. In contrast, electronic scanning and plaster of Paris were more common in Australia. Computer aided manufacture was utilised more frequently among respondents in Australia than in the UK and New Zealand. Respondents in all three countries specified more flexible shell materials for established RA, compared to early disease. Cushioning top covers (e.g. PORON® or polyurethane) were most frequently specified in all countries for both disease stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable variation was seen in the self-reported foot orthoses prescription habits of respondents for people with RA. Variation between countries and disease stage was seen in type of orthoses, specific brands, manufacturing methods, and materials prescribed. The results allow podiatrists and broader health service providers to compare their practice against reported national and international patterns.

摘要

背景

指南建议为早期(<2年)和确诊的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者使用足部矫形器。虽然预制足部矫形器价格较低,且效果与定制器械相当,但关于其有效性的现有证据并不一致。对于临床医生开具何种类型的足部矫形器,人们知之甚少。本研究描述了足病医生为类风湿性关节炎患者开具足部矫形器的习惯。

方法

来自英国(n = 88)、澳大利亚(n = 68)和新西兰(n = 27)的183名足病医生完成了一项关于在临床实践中为类风湿性关节炎患者开具的足部矫形器类型的在线自填式调查。本研究是一项更广泛的探索足部矫形器处方习惯的国际调查的一部分。

结果

英国受访者更倾向于为早期类风湿性关节炎患者开具预制矫形器(n = 47,53%),为确诊类风湿性关节炎患者开具定制矫形器(n = 47,53%)。澳大利亚的受访者更倾向于为早期(n = 32,47%)和确诊(n = 46,68%)类风湿性关节炎患者开具定制矫形器,而新西兰的受访者更倾向于为早期(n = 16,59%)和确诊(n = 10,37%)疾病患者开具预制矫形器。无论疾病处于何种阶段,在制造定制矫形器之前获取足部模型时,英国和新西兰使用泡沫印模盒更为普遍。相比之下,电子扫描和石膏在澳大利亚更为常见。澳大利亚的受访者比英国和新西兰的受访者更频繁地使用计算机辅助制造。与早期疾病相比,所有三个国家的受访者为确诊类风湿性关节炎患者指定的外壳材料更具柔韧性。在所有国家,两个疾病阶段最常指定的缓冲顶盖(如PORON®或聚氨酯)。

结论

受访者为类风湿性关节炎患者开具足部矫形器的自我报告习惯存在相当大的差异。在矫形器类型、特定品牌、制造方法和开具的材料方面,国家和疾病阶段之间存在差异。这些结果使足病医生和更广泛的医疗服务提供者能够将他们的做法与报告的国内和国际模式进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3080/6347791/86a0a508c8bc/13047_2019_314_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验