Bogomolov S N, Kulikov A N, Tikhonova J A, Solntsev V N, Rybakova M G, Gudkova A Y, Kuchmin A N
Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Pavlov Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Ter Arkh. 2018 Sep 20;90(9):73-80. doi: 10.26442/terarkh201890973-80.
The aim of the study is to assess the compliance of the results of electrocardiographic (ECG) and echocardiographic diagnostic methods of hypertrophy of left ventricular myocardium (LVH) with the postmortem finding of measurement of left ventricular myocardium mass (LVM).
We examined the data of intravital study of anthropometric measurements [age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI)], instrumental results [12-lead ECG, EchoCG], as well as the postmortem finding (direct measurement of LVM at autopsy) in 15 patients of general therapy department. While analyzing ECG we studied as conventional ECG criteria for the detection of LVH as well as the author's own criteria based on two models (regression and discriminant analyses), including voltage, sex and age criteria. Echocardiographic diagnostic method used to calculate LVM (according to ASE formula) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Postmortem finding of LVM was carried out according to the standard measurement method. According to the absence of the single conventional postmortem finding of measurement of LVH, we considered three different variants of the postmortem finding of LVH: the criterion of K. Bove et al. (CB); the criterion of A.M. Lifshitz, also called ventricular index (VI) and the criterion of P. Casale - the left ventricular mass index at autopsy (LVMI).
Conventional ECG criteria for the detection of LVH showed high specificity (71-100%) using any method of the postmortem finding of measurement, but were characterized by extremely low sensitivity (0-37.5%). Their overall diagnostic accuracy was higher on using K. Bove or A.M. Lifshitz criteria (40-66.7%) and low - on using the criterion of P. Casale (13.3-40%). The author's ECG criteria were less specificity (50-100%) and had higher sensitivity (54-75%), and their diagnostic accuracy remained higher and showed small dependence on the method of the postmortem finding of measurement of LVH (60-66.7%).
Usually the ECG criteria to diagnose left ventricular hypertrophy were expectedly showed low sensitivity using any method of the postmortem finding of measurement. Meanwhile, the author's own ECG criteria associated with the most sensitive electrocardiographic characteristics to LVH and sex and age-specific indexes of the examined patients exceeded the conventional ECG criteria in sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy.
本研究旨在评估左心室心肌肥厚(LVH)的心电图(ECG)和超声心动图诊断方法的结果与左心室心肌质量(LVM)尸检测量结果的符合程度。
我们检查了15名普通治疗科患者的人体测量学活体研究数据[年龄、身高、体重、体重指数(BMI)]、仪器检查结果[12导联心电图、超声心动图]以及尸检结果(尸检时直接测量LVM)。分析心电图时,我们研究了用于检测LVH的传统心电图标准以及基于两种模型(回归分析和判别分析)的作者自己的标准,包括电压、性别和年龄标准。超声心动图诊断方法用于计算LVM(根据美国超声心动图学会公式)和左心室质量指数(LVMI)。LVM的尸检结果根据标准测量方法进行。由于缺乏单一的传统LVH测量尸检结果,我们考虑了LVH尸检结果的三种不同变体:K. Bove等人的标准(CB);A.M. Lifshitz的标准,也称为心室指数(VI)和P. Casale的标准——尸检时的左心室质量指数(LVMI)。
使用任何尸检测量方法,检测LVH的传统心电图标准显示出高特异性(71 - 100%),但灵敏度极低(0 - 37.5%)。使用K. Bove或A.M. Lifshitz标准时,其总体诊断准确性较高(40 - 66.7%),而使用P. Casale标准时较低(13.3 - 40%)。作者的心电图标准特异性较低(50 - 100%),灵敏度较高(54 - 75%),其诊断准确性仍然较高,并且对LVH测量的尸检方法依赖性较小(60 - 66.7%)。
通常,使用任何尸检测量方法,诊断左心室肥厚的心电图标准预期灵敏度较低。同时,作者自己的心电图标准与LVH最敏感的心电图特征以及受检患者的性别和年龄特异性指标相关,在灵敏度和诊断准确性方面超过了传统心电图标准。