Oper Dent. 2019 Nov/Dec;44(6):625-636. doi: 10.2341/18-163-L. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
To analyze the shrinkage stress, bonding interaction, and failure modes between different low-viscosity bulk fill resin composites and conventional resin composites produced by the same manufacturer or a high-viscosity bulk fill resin composite used to restore the occlusal layer in posterior teeth.
METHODS & MATERIALS: Three low-viscosity bulk fill resin composites were associated with the conventional resin composites made by the same manufacturers or with a high-viscosity bulk fill resin composite, resulting in six groups (n=10). The bonding interaction between resin composites was tested by assessing the microshear bond strength (μSBS). The samples were thermocycled and were tested with 1-mm/min crosshead speed, and the failure mode was evaluated. The post-gel shrinkage (Shr) of all the resin composites was measured using a strain gauge (n=10). The modulus of elasticity (E) and the hardness (KHN) were measured using the Knoop hardness test. Two-dimensional finite element models were created for analyzing the stress caused by shrinkage and contact loading. The μSBS, Shr, E, and KHN data were analyzed using the Student -test and one-way analysis of variance. The failure mode data were subjected to chi-square analysis (α=0.05). The stress distribution was analyzed qualitatively.
No significant difference was verified for μSBS between low-viscosity bulk fill resin composites and conventional or high-viscosity bulk fill composites in terms of restoring the occlusal layer (=0.349). Cohesive failure of the low-viscosity bulk fill resin composites was the most frequent failure mode. The Shr, E, and KHN varied between low-viscosity and high-viscosity resin composites. The use of high-viscosity bulk fill resin composites on the occlusal layer reduced the stress at the enamel interface on the occlusal surface.
The use of high-viscosity bulk fill resin composites as an occlusal layer for low-viscosity bulk fill resin composites to restore the posterior teeth can be a viable alternative, as it shows a similar bonding interaction to conventional resin composites as well as lower shrinkage stress at the enamel margin.
分析不同低黏度块状填充树脂复合材料与同一制造商生产的传统树脂复合材料或用于修复后牙咬合层的高黏度块状填充树脂复合材料之间的收缩应力、结合相互作用和失效模式。
将三种低黏度块状填充树脂复合材料与同一制造商生产的传统树脂复合材料或高黏度块状填充树脂复合材料相关联,共形成 6 组(n=10)。通过评估微剪切结合强度(μSBS)来测试树脂复合材料之间的结合相互作用。对样品进行热循环,并以 1mm/min 的十字头速度进行测试,评估失效模式。使用应变计测量所有树脂复合材料的后凝胶收缩(Shr)(n=10)。使用努普硬度试验测量弹性模量(E)和硬度(KHN)。创建二维有限元模型以分析收缩和接触加载引起的应力。使用 Student -检验和单因素方差分析对 μSBS、Shr、E 和 KHN 数据进行分析。使用卡方检验(α=0.05)对失效模式数据进行分析。定性分析了应力分布。
在修复咬合层方面,低黏度块状填充树脂复合材料与传统或高黏度块状填充复合材料之间的 μSBS 没有显著差异(=0.349)。低黏度块状填充树脂复合材料的最常见失效模式为内聚性失效。低黏度和高黏度树脂复合材料的 Shr、E 和 KHN 不同。在咬合层使用高黏度块状填充树脂复合材料可以减少咬合面釉质界面的应力。
在后牙修复中,将高黏度块状填充树脂复合材料用作低黏度块状填充树脂复合材料的咬合层是一种可行的替代方案,因为它与传统树脂复合材料具有相似的结合相互作用,并且在釉质边缘处的收缩应力较低。