Cardoso Igor Oliveiros, Machado Alexandre Coelho, Fernandes Luísa de Oliveira, Soares Paulo Vinícius, Raposo Luís Henrique Araújo
Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Technical School of Health, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Eur J Dent. 2022 May;16(2):360-366. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735799. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different light-curing units (LCUs) with distinct tip diameters and light spectra for activating bulk-fill resins.
The specimens ( = 10) were made from a conventional composite (Amaris, VOCO) and bulk-fill resins (Aura Bulk Fill, SDI; Filtek One, 3M ESPE; Tetric Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) with two diameters, 7 or 10 mm, × 2 mm thickness. Following 24 hours of specimen preparation, the degree of conversion (DC) was evaluated using the Fourier-transform infrared unit. Knoop hardness (KHN) readings were performed on the center and periphery of the specimens. Data were assessed for homoscedasticity and submitted to one-way and three-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey's and Dunnett's tests, depending on the analysis performed (α = 0.05).
LCUs and specimen diameter significantly affected the DC. The provided increased DC results when light-cured with (54.8 and 53.5%, for 7 and 10 mm, respectively) compared with (52.1 and 52.9%, for 7 and 10 mm, respectively). No significant differences in KHN results were noted for the conventional resin composite () compared with LCUs ( = 0.213) or disc diameters ( = 0.587), but the center of the specimen exhibited superior KHN ( ≤ 0.001) than the periphery.
The light spectrum of the multipeak LCU () significantly increased the DC and KHN of the bulk-fill resin composite with additional initiator to camphorquinone () compared with the monowave LCU (). The tip size of the LCUs influenced the performance of some of the resin composites tested.
本研究旨在评估不同尖端直径和光谱的光固化单元(LCU)对大块充填树脂固化的影响。
样本(n = 10)由传统复合树脂(Amaris,VOCO)和大块充填树脂(Aura Bulk Fill,SDI;Filtek One,3M ESPE;Tetric Bulk Fill,Ivoclar Vivadent)制成,有两种直径,7或10毫米,厚度为2毫米。样本制备24小时后,使用傅里叶变换红外仪评估转化率(DC)。在样本的中心和周边进行努氏硬度(KHN)读数。根据所进行的分析,对数据进行同质性评估,并进行单因素和三因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey检验和Dunnett检验(α = 0.05)。
LCU和样本直径对DC有显著影响。与[某特定LCU(原文未明确写出名称)](7毫米和10毫米分别为52.1%和52.9%)相比,[另一特定LCU(原文未明确写出名称)]光固化时可提高DC结果(7毫米和10毫米分别为54.8%和53.5%)。与LCU(P = 0.213)或圆盘直径(P = 0.587)相比,传统树脂复合材料([具体材料名称未明确写出])的KHN结果无显著差异,但样本中心的KHN高于周边(P≤0.001)。
与单波LCU([具体名称未明确写出])相比,多峰LCU([具体名称未明确写出])的光谱显著提高了添加了除樟脑醌([具体名称未明确写出])之外的引发剂的大块充填树脂复合材料的DC和KHN。LCU的尖端尺寸影响了一些测试树脂复合材料的性能。