Suppr超能文献

一项比较美索比妥和丙泊酚用于接受血管紧张素轴阻断治疗患者诱导麻醉的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial comparing methohexital and propofol for induction in patients receiving angiotensin axis blockade.

作者信息

Bonavia Anthony, Verbeek Thomas, Adhikary Sanjib, Kunselman Allen, Budde Arne, Lyn-Sue Jerome, Mets Berend

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine.

Department of Public Health Sciences.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(5):e14374. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014374.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacologic angiotensin axis blockade (AAB) has been associated with profound hypotension following anesthetic induction with propofol. To combat this problem, investigators have attempted to withhold angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) preoperatively, or evaluated the effects of different induction agents in conferring greater hemodynamic stability. To date, methohexital has not been compared with the most commonly used induction agent, propofol. Hence, the primary objective was to study the hypothesis that methohexital confers a better hemodynamic profile than propofol for anesthetic induction, in patients receiving AAB. The secondary objective was to investigate the postinduction levels of serum neurohormones in an attempt to explain the mechanisms involved.

METHODS

Forty-five adult, hypertensive patients taking ACEi or ARB and scheduled for elective, noncardiac surgery completed the study. Patients were randomized to receive equi-anesthetic doses of either propofol or methohexital for anesthetic induction. Hemodynamic variables were measured and blood samples were drawn before induction and for 15 minutes afterwards.

RESULTS

Methohexital resulted in less hypotension compared with propofol (P = .01), although the degree of refractory hypotension was similar (P = .37). The postinduction systolic blood pressure (P = .03), diastolic blood pressure (P < .001) and heart rate (P = .03) were significantly higher in the methohexital group. A nonsignificant elevation of serum norepinephrine and epinephrine levels was observed in the methohexital group, while serum arginine vasopressin and angiotensin II levels did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

While methohexital was shown to confer greater hemodynamic stability in patients taking ACEi/ARB, the measured hormone levels could not explain the mechanism for this effect.

摘要

背景

药理学上的血管紧张素轴阻断(AAB)与丙泊酚麻醉诱导后严重低血压有关。为解决这一问题,研究人员尝试术前停用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),或评估不同诱导药物在提供更大血流动力学稳定性方面的效果。迄今为止,美索比妥尚未与最常用的诱导药物丙泊酚进行比较。因此,主要目的是研究在接受AAB的患者中,美索比妥在麻醉诱导时比丙泊酚具有更好的血流动力学特征这一假设。次要目的是研究诱导后血清神经激素水平,以试图解释其中涉及的机制。

方法

45例服用ACEi或ARB且计划进行择期非心脏手术的成年高血压患者完成了该研究。患者被随机分配接受等麻醉剂量的丙泊酚或美索比妥进行麻醉诱导。在诱导前及诱导后15分钟测量血流动力学变量并采集血样。

结果

与丙泊酚相比,美索比妥导致的低血压程度较轻(P = 0.01),尽管难治性低血压的程度相似(P = 0.37)。美索比妥组诱导后的收缩压(P = 0.03)、舒张压(P < 0.001)和心率(P = 0.03)显著更高。美索比妥组血清去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素水平有非显著性升高,而两组间血清精氨酸加压素和血管紧张素II水平无差异。

结论

虽然美索比妥在服用ACEi/ARB的患者中显示出更大的血流动力学稳定性,但所测激素水平无法解释这种作用的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0184/6380663/83344a8d456f/medi-98-e14374-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验