Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与美索比妥作为电休克治疗麻醉诱导剂的比较。

Comparison of propofol and methohexitone as an induction agent in anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy.

作者信息

Lim S K, Lim W L, Elegbe E O

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

West Afr J Med. 1996 Oct-Dec;15(4):186-9.

PMID:9020593
Abstract

30 patients who received electroconvulsive therapy were anaesthetized with either Propofol or Methohexitone in a randomized cross-over study. Recovery times were shorter in those who received Propofol. The decrease in diastolic pressure after induction was greater with Propofol than with Methohexitone. There was a greater increase in the blood pressure after the electroconvulsive therapy in those who received Methohexitone. The duration of convulsion was similar for both agents.

摘要

在一项随机交叉研究中,30名接受电休克治疗的患者分别使用丙泊酚或美索比妥进行麻醉。接受丙泊酚麻醉的患者恢复时间更短。诱导后,丙泊酚导致的舒张压下降幅度大于美索比妥。接受美索比妥麻醉的患者在电休克治疗后血压升高幅度更大。两种药物导致的惊厥持续时间相似。

相似文献

5
Propofol for electroconvulsive therapy. A comparison with methohexitone. Preliminary report.
Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:61-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09073.x.
9
A retrospective comparison of anesthetic agents in electroconvulsive therapy.
J ECT. 2006 Dec;22(4):243-6. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000244238.17791.a4.
10
Comparison of propofol and methohexitone as anaesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy.
Anaesthesia. 1988 Jun;43(6):459-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06631.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验