Suppr超能文献

4 米步行测试评估的步态速度不能代表社区居住成年人日常生活中的步态速度。

Gait speed assessed by a 4-m walk test is not representative of daily-life gait speed in community-dwelling adults.

机构信息

Department of Human Movement Sciences, @AgeAmsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, the Netherlands.

Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Maturitas. 2019 Mar;121:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Standardized tests of gait speed are regarded as being of clinical value, but they are typically performed under optimal conditions, and may not reflect daily-life gait behavior. The aim of this study was to compare 4-m gait speed to the distribution of daily-life gait speed.

STUDY DESIGN

The cross-sectional Grey Power cohort included 254 community-dwelling participants aged 18 years or more.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pearson's correlations were used to compare gait speed assessed using a timed 4-m walk test at preferred pace, and daily-life gait speed obtained from tri-axial lower-back accelerometer data over seven consecutive days.

RESULTS

Participants (median age 66.7 years [IQR 59.4-72.5], 65.7% female) had a mean 4-m gait speed of 1.43 m/s (SD 0.21), and a mean 50th percentile of daily-life gait speed of 0.90 m/s (SD 0.23). Ninety-six percent had a bimodal distribution of daily-life gait speed, with a mean 1st peak of 0.61 m/s (SD 0.15) and 2nd peak of 1.26 m/s (SD 0.23). The percentile of the daily-life distribution that corresponded best with the individual 4-m gait speed had a median value of 91.2 (IQR 75.4-98.6). The 4-m gait speed was very weakly correlated to the 1st and 2nd peak (r = 0.005, p = 0.936 and r=0.181, p = 0.004), and the daily-life gait speed percentiles (range: 1st percentile r = 0.076, p = 0.230 to 99th percentile r = 0.399, p < 0.001; 50th percentile r = 0.132, p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

The 4-m gait speed is only weakly related to daily-life gait speed. Clinicians and researchers should consider that 4-m gait speed and daily-life gait speed represent two different constructs.

摘要

目的

步态速度的标准化测试被认为具有临床价值,但这些测试通常是在最佳条件下进行的,可能无法反映日常生活中的步态行为。本研究旨在比较 4 米步行速度与日常生活中步态速度的分布。

研究设计

这项横断面灰色力量队列研究纳入了 254 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的社区居住参与者。

主要观察指标

使用定时 4 米步行测试评估的步态速度与通过三轴腰部加速度计在连续 7 天内获得的日常生活步态速度之间的相关性采用皮尔逊相关分析进行比较。

结果

参与者(中位年龄 66.7 岁[IQR 59.4-72.5],65.7%为女性)的 4 米步行速度平均为 1.43m/s(SD 0.21),日常生活中步态速度的 50 百分位数为 0.90m/s(SD 0.23)。96%的日常生活步态速度呈双峰分布,平均第 1 峰值为 0.61m/s(SD 0.15),第 2 峰值为 1.26m/s(SD 0.23)。与个体 4 米步行速度最匹配的日常生活分布百分位数中位数为 91.2(IQR 75.4-98.6)。4 米步行速度与第 1 峰值和第 2 峰值相关性较弱(r=0.005,p=0.936 和 r=0.181,p=0.004),与日常生活步态速度百分位数相关性也较弱(范围:第 1 百分位数 r=0.076,p=0.230 至第 99 百分位数 r=0.399,p<0.001;第 50 百分位数 r=0.132,p=0.036)。

结论

4 米步行速度与日常生活步态速度相关性较弱。临床医生和研究人员应认识到,4 米步行速度和日常生活步态速度代表两种不同的构念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验