Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Universidade da Coruña, Gerontology Research Group, Instituto de Investigación biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), SERGAS, A Coruña, Spain.
Maturitas. 2019 Mar;121:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
To analyze the definition of "cognitive frailty" and to study the conceptual and operational definitions used and their implications for empirical research. The relationships between this concept and cognitive reserve, the role of neuropathology and brain reserve, motor signs of aging and the reversibility of cognitive frailty are also discussed.
Systematic review of empirical studies identified from Medline Advanced 1966, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus until August 2017.
MAIN - OUTCOME MEASURES: Effect sizes. The quality of the articles was assessed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Statement. Three independent reviewers participated in the study selection and data extraction.
Nineteen studies involving 31,707 participants met the inclusion criteria. Significant associations were reported between cognitive frailty and physical frailty or gait speed. Screening instruments were usually used to determine objective cognitive decline rather than extensive neuropsychological assessments. Educational level was the only indicator of cognitive reserve that was systematically included in the evaluation of cognitive frailty. Motor decline and gait variables were not systematically included in protocols for the assessment of cognitive frailty.
A strong operational definition would benefit both the development of treatments to counter cognitive frailty and the assessment of treatment effectiveness. Nevertheless, since there is clear agreement regarding the importance of interventions for and the prevention of cognitive frailty, randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of preventive interventions are necessary.
分析“认知脆弱”的定义,并研究使用的概念和操作定义及其对实证研究的影响。还讨论了这个概念与认知储备、神经病理学和大脑储备的作用、衰老的运动迹象以及认知脆弱的可逆性之间的关系。
对 1966 年 8 月以前在 Medline 高级、CINAHL、Web of Science、PsycINFO 和 Scopus 中确定的实证研究进行系统评价。
效应大小。文章的质量由系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行评估。三名独立的审查员参与了研究选择和数据提取。
有 19 项研究涉及 31707 名参与者符合纳入标准。认知脆弱与身体脆弱或步态速度之间存在显著关联。筛选工具通常用于确定客观认知下降,而不是广泛的神经心理学评估。教育水平是唯一被系统纳入认知脆弱评估的认知储备指标。在评估认知脆弱的方案中,并没有系统地纳入运动下降和步态变量。
强有力的操作定义将有利于制定治疗认知脆弱的方法和评估治疗效果。然而,由于干预和预防认知脆弱的重要性已经达成共识,因此有必要进行随机对照试验,以调查预防干预的效果。