HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):e021832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021832.
To determine the economic impact of three drugs commonly involved in potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in adults aged ≥65 years, including their adverse effects (AEs): long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), benzodiazepines and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at maximal dose; to assess cost-effectiveness of potential interventions to reduce PIP of each drug.
Cost-utility analysis. We developed Markov models incorporating the AEs of each PIP, populated with published estimates of probabilities, health system costs (in 2014 euro) and utilities.
A hypothetical cohort of 65 year olds analysed over 35 1-year cycles with discounting at 5% per year.
Incremental cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with 95% credible intervals (CIs, generated in probabilistic sensitivity analysis) between each PIP and an appropriate alternative strategy. Models were then used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of potential interventions to reduce PIP for each of the three drug classes.
All three PIP drugs and their AEs are associated with greater cost and fewer QALYs compared with alternatives. The largest reduction in QALYs and incremental cost was for benzodiazepines compared with no sedative medication (€3470, 95% CI €2434 to €5001; -0.07 QALYs, 95% CI -0.089 to -0.047), followed by NSAIDs relative to paracetamol (€806, 95% CI €415 and €1346; -0.07 QALYs, 95% CI -0.131 to -0.026), and maximal dose PPIs compared with maintenance dose PPIs (€989, 95% CI -€69 and €2127; -0.01 QALYs, 95% CI -0.029 to 0.003). For interventions to reduce PIP, at a willingness-to-pay of €45 000 per QALY, targeting NSAIDs would be cost-effective up to the highest intervention cost per person of €1971. For benzodiazepine and PPI interventions, the equivalent cost was €1480 and €831, respectively.
Long-term benzodiazepine and NSAID prescribing are associated with significantly increased costs and reduced QALYs. Targeting inappropriate NSAID prescribing appears to be the most cost-effective PIP intervention.
确定三种常用于老年人(≥65 岁)潜在不适当处方(PIP)的药物的经济影响,包括其不良反应(AE):长期使用最大剂量的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、苯二氮䓬类药物和质子泵抑制剂(PPIs);评估减少每种药物 PIP 的潜在干预措施的成本效益。
成本效用分析。我们开发了包含每种 PIP 的 AE 的马尔可夫模型,使用已发表的概率、医疗系统成本(2014 年欧元)和效用进行填充。
对一个假设的 65 岁人群进行了 35 个 1 年周期的分析,并按每年 5%的贴现率进行贴现。
与适当替代策略相比,所有三种 PIP 药物及其 AE 与更高的成本和更少的 QALYs 相关。与无镇静药物相比,苯二氮䓬类药物的 QALYs 和增量成本降幅最大(€3470,95%可信区间[CI]为€2434 至 €5001;-0.07 QALYs,95%CI 为-0.089 至-0.047),其次是与扑热息痛相比的 NSAIDs(€806,95%CI 为€415 和 €1346;-0.07 QALYs,95%CI 为-0.131 至-0.026),以及与维持剂量 PPIs 相比的最大剂量 PPIs(€989,95%CI 为€-69 和 €2127;-0.01 QALYs,95%CI 为-0.029 至 0.003)。对于降低 PIP 的干预措施,在每 QALY 愿意支付 45000 欧元的情况下,针对 NSAIDs 的干预措施在每人最高干预成本为 1971 欧元时具有成本效益。对于苯二氮䓬类药物和 PPI 干预措施,相应的成本分别为€1480 和€831。
长期使用苯二氮䓬类药物和 NSAIDs 与成本显著增加和 QALYs 降低相关。针对不适当的 NSAIDs 处方似乎是最具成本效益的 PIP 干预措施。