Suppr超能文献

非骨水泥型与骨水泥型反肩关节置换术治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效

Outcomes of Uncemented Versus Cemented Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures.

作者信息

Schoch Bradley, Aibinder William, Walters Jordan, Sperling John, Throckmorton Thomas, Sanchez-Sotelo Joaquin, Duquin Thomas

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2019 Mar 1;42(2):e236-e241. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190125-03. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

Abstract

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) is traditionally performed with cemented humeral fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cemented and cementless RSA for PHF. Between 2010 and 2014, 38 acute PHFs were treated with RSA and followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 37 months; range, 24-66 months). The mean time from fracture to RSA was 7 days (range, 1-30 days). Humeral stems were cemented in 19 shoulders and uncemented in 19 shoulders. Outcome measures included visual analog scale pain scores, range of motion, postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and radiographic parameters. The 2 groups had similar visual analog scale pain scores, postoperative range of motion, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (P>.05). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and satisfaction scores were significantly higher with cemented humeral fixation (76.3 vs 48.0, P=.005; 1.2 vs 1.8, P=.04). Radiographically, there was no difference in terms of tuberosity healing, component loosening, or notching (P>.05). Reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides pain relief for PHF, regardless of humeral fixation. In this cohort, cementless fixation was associated with worse patient-reported outcomes, although no correlation could be established with pain, motion, or tuberosity healing. Further studies are required before cementless fixation can be recommended for RSA for fracture. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e236-e241.].

摘要

对于肱骨近端骨折(PHF),传统上采用骨水泥固定的肱骨假体进行反肩关节置换术(RSA)。本研究的目的是比较骨水泥型和非骨水泥型RSA治疗PHF的临床和影像学结果。2010年至2014年期间,38例急性PHF患者接受了RSA治疗,并随访至少2年(平均37个月;范围24 - 66个月)。从骨折到RSA的平均时间为7天(范围1 - 30天)。19例肩关节采用骨水泥固定肱骨干假体,19例肩关节采用非骨水泥固定。结果指标包括视觉模拟评分疼痛分数、活动范围、术后上肢、肩部和手部快速残疾评分、美国肩肘外科医师评分以及影像学参数。两组在视觉模拟评分疼痛分数、术后活动范围和上肢、肩部和手部快速残疾评分方面相似(P>0.05)。骨水泥固定肱骨干假体的美国肩肘外科医师评分和满意度评分显著更高(76.3对48.0,P = 0.005;1.2对1.8,P = 0.04)。在影像学上,结节愈合、假体松动或骨切迹方面无差异(P>0.05)。无论肱骨固定方式如何,反肩关节置换术均可缓解PHF的疼痛。在该队列中,非骨水泥固定与患者报告的结果较差相关,尽管无法确定与疼痛、活动或结节愈合之间的相关性。在推荐非骨水泥固定用于骨折的RSA之前,还需要进一步研究。[《骨科》。2019;42(2):e236 - e241。]

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验