Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Jun;44(3):489-492. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12804. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
Appraisal of drug information centres (DICs) is mainly by word of mouth communication and surveys of overall user satisfaction. Efforts to study the impact of this type of informatics and decision support systematically are generally lacking within the healthcare system.
Scandinavian DICs question-answering databases are relevant sources for identifying recurring problems in pharmacotherapy, including drug safety questions, and for re-use of previous answers. Recent studies in this setting have shown that high-quality answers demand easily accessible literature sources, skills in literature search and critical assessment of the retrieved documentation. Furthermore, patient-specific advice in clinical cases presented within a requested time frame is appraised by clinicians.
Effective decision support by Scandinavian DICs depends on skills among staff and technological resources. Our experience could motivate further studies investigating methods and evaluating the impact of DICs in the healthcare system.
药物信息中心(DIC)的评估主要通过口碑传播和对整体用户满意度的调查。在医疗保健系统中,人们普遍缺乏对这种信息学和决策支持影响的研究。
斯堪的纳维亚 DIC 问答数据库是识别药物治疗中反复出现的问题(包括药物安全问题)的相关来源,也是重复使用以前答案的来源。在这种情况下,最近的研究表明,高质量的答案需要易于访问的文献来源、文献检索技能和对检索文档的批判性评估。此外,临床医生还会评估在规定时间内提出的临床病例中的患者具体建议。
斯堪的纳维亚 DIC 的有效决策支持取决于员工的技能和技术资源。我们的经验可以激发进一步的研究,调查方法并评估 DIC 在医疗保健系统中的影响。