Suppr超能文献

异亮氨酰-tRNA 合成酶对降缬氨酸的编辑作用机制与起源。

On the Mechanism and Origin of Isoleucyl-tRNA Synthetase Editing against Norvaline.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.

Proteome Center Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen 72076, Germany.

出版信息

J Mol Biol. 2019 Mar 15;431(6):1284-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

Abstract

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), the enzymes responsible for coupling tRNAs to their cognate amino acids, minimize translational errors by intrinsic hydrolytic editing. Here, we compared norvaline (Nva), a linear amino acid not coded for protein synthesis, to the proteinogenic, branched valine (Val) in their propensity to mistranslate isoleucine (Ile) in proteins. We show that in the synthetic site of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS), Nva and Val are activated and transferred to tRNA at similar rates. The efficiency of the synthetic site in pre-transfer editing of Nva and Val also appears to be similar. Post-transfer editing was, however, more rapid with Nva and consequently IleRS misaminoacylates Nva-tRNA at slower rate than Val-tRNA. Accordingly, an Escherichia coli strain lacking IleRS post-transfer editing misincorporated Nva and Val in the proteome to a similar extent and at the same Ile positions. However, Nva mistranslation inflicted higher toxicity than Val, in agreement with IleRS editing being optimized for hydrolysis of Nva-tRNA. Furthermore, we found that the evolutionary-related IleRS, leucyl- and valyl-tRNA synthetases (I/L/VRSs), all efficiently hydrolyze Nva-tRNAs even when editing of Nva seems redundant. We thus hypothesize that editing of Nva-tRNAs had already existed in the last common ancestor of I/L/VRSs, and that the editing domain of I/L/VRSs had primarily evolved to prevent infiltration of Nva into modern proteins.

摘要

氨酰-tRNA 合成酶(aaRSs)负责将 tRNA 与对应的氨基酸连接,通过内在的水解编辑最小化翻译错误。在这里,我们将非蛋白合成所需的线性氨基酸正缬氨酸(Nva)与支链氨基酸缬氨酸(Val)进行比较,研究它们在蛋白质中误译异亮氨酸(Ile)的倾向。我们发现,在异亮氨酰-tRNA 合成酶(IleRS)的合成部位,Nva 和 Val 的激活和转移到 tRNA 的速率相似。Nva 和 Val 的合成部位在预转移编辑中的效率似乎也相似。然而,Nva 的后转移编辑更快,因此 IleRS 对 Nva-tRNA 的误氨酰化速度比 Val-tRNA 慢。因此,缺乏 IleRS 后转移编辑的大肠杆菌菌株以相似的程度和相同的 Ile 位置在蛋白质组中错误掺入 Nva 和 Val。然而,Nva 误译造成的毒性比 Val 高,这与 IleRS 编辑针对 Nva-tRNA 的水解优化一致。此外,我们发现进化相关的 IleRS、亮氨酰-tRNA 合成酶(LeuRS)和缬氨酰-tRNA 合成酶(ValRS)都能有效地水解 Nva-tRNAs,即使 Nva 的编辑似乎是多余的。因此,我们假设 Nva-tRNAs 的编辑在 I/L/VRSs 的最后共同祖先中就已经存在,并且 I/L/VRSs 的编辑结构域主要是为了防止 Nva 渗透到现代蛋白质中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验