Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Feb;155(2):216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.024.
The aims of this study were to evaluate facial bilateral soft tissue thickness in symmetric and asymmetric subjects and to investigate whether soft tissue compensates for skeletal asymmetry.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 97 subjects were divided into a symmetry group (GSm) and an asymmetry group (GASm). Seven bilateral points were established. Each point involved 3 variables: hard tissue distance (Hard-D), soft tissue distance (Soft-D), and soft tissue thickness (Soft-Th). Measurements were taken from software-generated multiplanar reconstructions. A paired t test was used to assess intragroup differences and an independent t test for intergroup analysis. Pearson coefficient tested correlations between variables.
In GASm, significant differences were found in all Hard-D and Soft-D measurements, with higher values observed on the deviated side (P <0.01). As for Soft-Th evaluation, results of only 1 reference point presented statistical significance. Intergroup comparison detected significant differences in all Hard-D and Soft-D variables (P <0.01), but no significant differences in Soft-Th.
Asymmetric subjects presented differences in hard and soft tissue distances between deviated and nondeviated sides, although without affecting soft tissue thickness. It can be concluded that soft tissue does not compensate or disguise an underlying skeletal asymmetry.
本研究旨在评估对称和不对称受试者的面部双侧软组织厚度,并探讨软组织是否补偿骨骼不对称。
将 97 名受试者的锥形束 CT(CBCT)扫描分为对称组(GSm)和不对称组(GASm)。建立了 7 个双侧点。每个点涉及 3 个变量:硬组织距离(Hard-D)、软组织距离(Soft-D)和软组织厚度(Soft-Th)。从软件生成的多平面重建中进行测量。采用配对 t 检验评估组内差异,采用独立 t 检验进行组间分析。Pearson 系数检验变量之间的相关性。
在 GASm 中,所有 Hard-D 和 Soft-D 测量均存在显著差异,偏侧侧的数值较高(P<0.01)。对于 Soft-Th 的评估,只有 1 个参考点的结果具有统计学意义。组间比较发现所有 Hard-D 和 Soft-D 变量均存在显著差异(P<0.01),但 Soft-Th 无显著差异。
不对称受试者的偏侧和非偏侧侧的硬组织和软组织距离存在差异,但不影响软组织厚度。可以得出结论,软组织不会补偿或掩盖潜在的骨骼不对称。