Nézelof C
Laboratoire central d'Anatomie pathologique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris.
Arch Fr Pediatr. 1988;45 Suppl 1:769-71.
The author reconsiders Stanford classification which separates 3 degrees of rejection of transplanted hearts: minimal, moderate or severe rejection. This classification, widely used, was enriched with J. Kennitz's sub-varieties, based on more than 4,000 endomyocardial biopsies, performed on 132 patients who underwent heart transplantation. Interpretation of the histopathologic results of endomyocardial biopsies requires careful knowledge of simultaneous clinical or biochemical data. However, heart biopsy remains indispensible since it is the only test providing information on the presence or absence of cellular infiltrate and on myocardial fibers changes. The difficulties result from the very small size of all samples. Several types of rejection are illustrated and commented. However, the author's experience is presently restricted and hardly allows separating moderate rejections from minimal or severe rejections.
作者重新审视了斯坦福分类法,该分类法将移植心脏的排斥反应分为三个程度:轻度、中度或重度排斥。这种广泛使用的分类法基于对132例接受心脏移植患者进行的4000多次心内膜活检,增加了J. 肯尼茨的子类别。心内膜活检组织病理学结果的解读需要同时仔细了解临床或生化数据。然而,心脏活检仍然不可或缺,因为它是唯一能提供关于是否存在细胞浸润以及心肌纤维变化信息的检测方法。困难源于所有样本的尺寸都非常小。文中举例说明了几种类型的排斥反应并进行了评论。然而,作者目前的经验有限,很难将中度排斥与轻度或重度排斥区分开来。