• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用开窗分支型血管内移植物对肾周和胸腹主动脉瘤进行腔内修复后健康相关生活质量的前瞻性评估。

Prospective assessment of health-related quality of life after endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Aortic Center, Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1356-1366.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.060. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.060
PMID:30714570
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate changes in health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients treated for pararenal aortic aneurysms (PAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR).

METHODS

A total of 159 consecutive patients (70% male; mean age, 75 ± 7 years) were enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized single-center study using manufactured F-BEVAR (2013-2016). All patients were observed for at least 12 months (mean follow-up time, 27 ± 12 months). Patients' health-related QOL was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire at baseline (N = 159), 6 to 8 weeks (n = 136), 6 months (n = 129), and 12 months (n = 123). Physical component scores (PCSs) and mental component scores (MCSs) were compared with historical results of patients enrolled in the endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) 1 trial who were treated by standard EVAR for simple infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

RESULTS

There were 57 patients with PAAs and 102 patients with TAAAs (50 extent IV and 52 extent I-III TAAAs). There were no 30-day deaths, in-hospital deaths, conversions to open surgery, or aorta-related deaths. Survival was 96% at 1 year and 87% at 2 years. Major adverse events occurred in 18% of patients, and 1-year reintervention rate was 14%. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in 30-day outcomes. Patients treated for TAAAs had lower baseline scores compared with those treated for PAAs (P < .05). PCS declined significantly 6 to 8 weeks after F-BEVAR in both groups and returned to baseline values at 12 months in the PAA group but not in the TAAA group. Patients with TAAAs had significantly lower PCSs at 12 months compared with those with PAAs (P < .001). There was no decline in mean MCS. Major adverse events were associated with decline in PCS assessed at 6 to 8 weeks (P = .021) but not in the subsequent evaluations. Reinterventions had no effect on PCS or MCS. Overall, patients treated by F-BEVAR had similar changes in QOL measures as those who underwent standard EVAR in the EVAR 1 trial, except for lower PCS in TAAA patients at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated for TAAAs had lower scores at baseline in their physical aspect of health-related QOL. F-BEVAR was associated with significant decline in PCSs in both groups, which improved after 2 months and returned to baseline values at 12 months in patients with PAAs but not in those with TAAAs. Patients treated for PAAs had similar changes in QOL compared with those treated for infrarenal aortic aneurysms with standard EVAR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨采用分支型腔内覆膜支架治疗肾周主动脉瘤(PAAs)和胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAAs)患者的健康相关生活质量(QOL)变化。

方法

共纳入 159 例连续患者(70%为男性;平均年龄 75±7 岁),采用前瞻性、非随机单中心研究方法,使用定制的分支型腔内覆膜支架(2013-2016 年)。所有患者均至少随访 12 个月(平均随访时间 27±12 个月)。使用 36 项简短健康调查问卷评估患者的健康相关 QOL,基线时(N=159)、6-8 周(n=136)、6 个月(n=129)和 12 个月(n=123)进行调查。与接受标准血管内修复术(EVAR)治疗简单肾下腹主动脉瘤的 EVAR1 试验中接受标准 EVAR 治疗的患者的历史结果进行比较,评估身体成分评分(PCS)和精神成分评分(MCS)。

结果

57 例患者为 PAAs,102 例患者为 TAAAs(50 例为 IV 期,52 例为 I-III 期 TAAAs)。无 30 天内死亡、院内死亡、转为开放手术或主动脉相关死亡。1 年生存率为 96%,2 年生存率为 87%。18%的患者发生重大不良事件,1 年再干预率为 14%。两组间 30 天结局无统计学差异。与治疗 PAAs 的患者相比,治疗 TAAAs 的患者基线评分较低(P<0.05)。两组患者在 F-BEVAR 后 6-8 周 PCS 显著下降,PAAs 组在 12 个月时恢复至基线水平,但 TAAA 组未恢复。12 个月时,TAAA 患者的 PCS 明显低于 PAAs 患者(P<0.001)。MCS 平均无下降。重大不良事件与 6-8 周时 PCS 下降有关(P=0.021),但与后续评估无关。再干预对 PCS 或 MCS 无影响。总体而言,接受 F-BEVAR 治疗的患者与 EVAR1 试验中接受标准 EVAR 治疗的患者的 QOL 测量结果相似,除 TAAA 患者 12 个月时 PCS 较低外。

结论

TAAA 患者在健康相关 QOL 的身体方面基线评分较低。F-BEVAR 治疗后两组 PCS 均显著下降,2 个月后改善,PAAs 组恢复至基线水平,但 TAAA 组未恢复。与接受标准 EVAR 治疗肾下主动脉瘤的患者相比,接受 PAAs 治疗的患者 QOL 变化相似。

相似文献

1
Prospective assessment of health-related quality of life after endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts.采用开窗分支型血管内移植物对肾周和胸腹主动脉瘤进行腔内修复后健康相关生活质量的前瞻性评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1356-1366.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.060. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
2
Prospective, nonrandomized study to evaluate endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts based on supraceliac sealing zones.一项前瞻性、非随机研究,旨在评估基于膈上密封区的开窗分支型腔内移植物对肾旁和胸腹主动脉瘤进行血管腔内修复的效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 May;65(5):1249-1259.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.038. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
3
Evolution from physician-modified to company-manufactured fenestrated-branched endografts to treat pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.从医师修改到公司制造的开窗分支型腔内移植物治疗肾周和胸腹主动脉瘤的演变。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):31-42.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.063. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
Effect of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm extent on outcomes in patients undergoing fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair.胸主动脉腹主动脉瘤程度对腔内修复治疗的开窗/分支血管内动脉瘤修复术患者结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):833-842.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.062. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Impact of previous open aortic repair on the outcome of thoracoabdominal fenestrated and branched endografts.既往开放性主动脉修复术对胸腹开窗及分支型腔内移植物治疗效果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1667-1675. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.051. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Adapting to a total endovascular approach for complex aortic aneurysm repair: Outcomes after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair.适应复杂主动脉瘤修复的全血管腔内治疗方法:开窗和分支型血管腔内主动脉修复术后的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1349-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.422. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
7
Natural history of isolated type II endoleaks in patients treated by fenestrated-branched endovascular repair for pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.覆膜分支腔内修复治疗肾周和胸腹主动脉瘤后孤立型 II 型内漏的自然史。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.041. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Results of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair after failed infrarenal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.内脏动脉区覆膜支架腔内隔绝术后失败的分支型和开窗型主动脉瘤腔内修复术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):849-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.026. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
Preoperative and postoperative predictors of clinical outcome of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in an Italian multicenter registry.意大利多中心注册研究中,开窗和分支腔内修复复杂腹主动脉和胸腹主动脉瘤的临床结局的术前和术后预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1795-1806.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.072. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
10
Five-year outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms based on aneurysm extent.基于瘤体范围的复杂主动脉瘤开窗和分支腔内修复的 5 年结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Debranching abdominal aortic hybrid surgery for aortic diseases involving the visceral arteries.用于涉及内脏动脉的主动脉疾病的去分支腹主动脉杂交手术。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 13;10:1219788. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1219788. eCollection 2023.
2
Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life After Fenestrated Endovascular Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.开窗型腔内血管修复治疗复杂型腹主动脉瘤的长期生存和生活质量。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2023 Aug;57(6):555-563. doi: 10.1177/15385744231154123. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
3
Endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: current status and future challenges.
胸腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复:现状与未来挑战。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Nov;10(6):744-767. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-taes-24.
4
Functional Performance After Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.复杂血管内主动脉修复术后的功能表现:单中心回顾性队列研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Dec;28(6):852-859. doi: 10.1177/15266028211028222. Epub 2021 Jun 30.