文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

从医师修改到公司制造的开窗分支型腔内移植物治疗肾周和胸腹主动脉瘤的演变。

Evolution from physician-modified to company-manufactured fenestrated-branched endografts to treat pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Aortic Center, Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Mayo Clinic Aortic Center, Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):31-42.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.063. Epub 2018 Dec 21.


DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.063
PMID:30583902
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review treatment trends and outcomes of patients who underwent fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) of pararenal aneurysms (PRAs) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) or company-manufactured devices (CMDs). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of 316 consecutive patients (242 male patients; mean age, 75 ± 8 years) who underwent F-BEVAR between 2007 and 2016. F-BEVAR was performed under two prospective investigational device exemption protocols since 2013. End points were mortality, major adverse events (MAEs), patient survival, reintervention, branch instability, aneurysm-related mortality, renal function deterioration, and target vessel patency. RESULTS: There were 145 patients (46%) treated by PMEGs (84 PRAs, 26 extent IV and 35 extent I-III TAAAs) and 171 patients (54%) who had CMDs (88 PRAs, 42 extent IV and 41 extent I-III TAAAs). Choice of endograft evolved from PMEGs in 131 patients (83%) treated in the first half of experience to CMDs in 144 patients (91%) treated in the second half of experience (P < .001). Patients treated by PMEGs had significantly (P < .05) larger aneurysms, more chronic pulmonary and kidney disease, and higher comorbidity severity scores. A total of 1081 renal-mesenteric arteries were targeted in both groups. Technical success was lower for PMEGs (98% vs 99.5%; P = .02). Thirty-day mortality was 5.5% for PMEGs (PRAs, 1.2%; extent IV 3.8% and extent I-III, 17.1%) and 0% for CMDs (P = .0018). Patients treated by PMEGs had significantly more (P < .001) MAEs (48% vs 23%) and longer hospital stay (9 ± 10 days vs 6 ± 6 days; P = .001). Mean follow-up was significantly longer for patients treated by PMEGs (38 ± 26 months vs 14 ± 12 months; P < .001). At 3 years, patient survival (68% ± 4% vs 67% ± 8%; P = .11), freedom from reintervention (68% ± 4% vs 68% ± 8%; P = .17), primary (94% ± 2% vs 92% ± 2%; P = .64) and secondary target vessel patency (98% ± 1% vs 98% ± 1%; P = .89), and freedom from renal function deterioration (75% ± 4% vs 65% ± 6%; P = .24) were similar for patients treated by PMEGs or CMDs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of F-BEVAR evolved from PMEGs to almost exclusively CMDs under physician-sponsored investigational device exemption protocols. PMEG patients had more comorbidities and larger aneurysms. CMDs were performed with higher technical success, no mortality, and fewer MAEs.

摘要

目的:本研究旨在回顾使用医生改良的内置移植物(PMEG)或公司制造的设备(CMD)行腔内分支型腹主动脉瘤修复术(F-BEVAR)治疗肾周动脉瘤(PRA)或胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)患者的治疗趋势和结果。

方法:我们回顾了 2007 年至 2016 年间连续 316 例接受 F-BEVAR 治疗的患者的临床数据。自 2013 年以来,F-BEVAR 是根据两项前瞻性研究器械豁免协议进行的。终点是死亡率、主要不良事件(MAE)、患者生存率、再次干预、分支不稳定、动脉瘤相关死亡率、肾功能恶化和靶血管通畅性。

结果:145 例患者(46%)接受了 PMEG(84 例 PRA,26 例 IV 型和 35 例 I-III 型 TAAA)治疗,171 例患者(54%)接受了 CMD(88 例 PRA,42 例 IV 型和 41 例 I-III 型 TAAA)治疗。在经验的前半段,有 131 例(83%)患者选择了 PMEG,在后半段,有 144 例(91%)患者选择了 CMD(P<0.001)。接受 PMEG 治疗的患者的动脉瘤明显更大(P<0.05),慢性肺和肾脏疾病更多,合并症严重程度评分更高。两组共定位了 1081 个肾肠系膜动脉。PMEG 的技术成功率较低(98%对 99.5%;P=0.02)。PMEG 的 30 天死亡率为 5.5%(PRA,1.2%;IV 型 3.8%和 I-III 型 17.1%),CMD 为 0%(P=0.0018)。接受 PMEG 治疗的患者的 MAE 发生率明显更高(48%对 23%),住院时间更长(9±10 天对 6±6 天;P=0.001)。接受 PMEG 治疗的患者的平均随访时间明显更长(38±26 个月对 14±12 个月;P<0.001)。在 3 年时,患者生存率(68%±4%对 67%±8%;P=0.11)、无再干预率(68%±4%对 68%±8%;P=0.17)、原发性(94%±2%对 92%±2%;P=0.64)和继发性靶血管通畅率(98%±1%对 98%±1%;P=0.89)以及肾功能恶化率(75%±4%对 65%±6%;P=0.24)相似。

结论:在医生发起的研究器械豁免协议下,F-BEVAR 的选择从 PMEG 演变几乎完全是 CMD。PMEG 患者的合并症更多,动脉瘤更大。CMD 的技术成功率更高,无死亡率,MAE 更少。

相似文献

[1]
Evolution from physician-modified to company-manufactured fenestrated-branched endografts to treat pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

J Vasc Surg. 2018-12-21

[2]
Prospective, nonrandomized study to evaluate endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts based on supraceliac sealing zones.

J Vasc Surg. 2017-5

[3]
Five-year outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms based on aneurysm extent.

J Vasc Surg. 2024-8

[4]
Outcomes of endovascular repair of chronic postdissection compared with degenerative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched stent grafts.

J Vasc Surg. 2020-9

[5]
Five-year outcomes of physician-modified endografts for repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

J Vasc Surg. 2023-2

[6]
Effect of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm extent on outcomes in patients undergoing fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair.

J Vasc Surg. 2021-9

[7]
Effect of aortic angulation on the outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair.

J Vasc Surg. 2021-8

[8]
Adapting to a total endovascular approach for complex aortic aneurysm repair: Outcomes after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair.

J Vasc Surg. 2017-11

[9]
Sex-related outcomes after fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the U.S. Fenestrated and Branched Aortic Research Consortium.

J Vasc Surg. 2021-9

[10]
Prospective assessment of health-related quality of life after endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts.

J Vasc Surg. 2018-10-24

引用本文的文献

[1]
Feasibility of Mixed Reality-assisted physician-modified endografts.

J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2025-6-21

[2]
Gastrointestinal complications and visceral circulation changes after intentional celiac artery embolization during complex endovascular aortic repair.

J Vasc Surg. 2025-4

[3]
Custom-Made Device (CMD) for the Repair of Thoraco-Abdominal Aneurysm (TAA): Mid-Long Term Outcomes from a Single Southeast Asian Centre Experience in Singapore.

J Clin Med. 2024-10-15

[4]
Complex abdominal aortic aneurysms: a review of radiological and clinical assessment, endovascular interventions, and current evidence of management outcomes.

BJR Open. 2024-8-22

[5]
Early Financial Outcomes of Physician Modified Endograft Programs Are Dictated by Device Cost.

J Surg Res. 2024-7

[6]
Current status and future development of aortic stent fenestration-assisted techniques.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2024-3-20

[7]
Changes in treatment patterns of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States.

JTCVS Open. 2023-9-11

[8]
Brazilian Society for Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm.

J Vasc Bras. 2023-10-30

[9]
Open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm-a narrative review.

J Thorac Dis. 2023-7-31

[10]
Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endografts for Preservation of Main and Accessory Renal Arteries in Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms.

J Clin Med. 2023-7-15

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索