Gasbarro Nicole M, DiDomenico Robert J
Department of Pharmacy, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 1;76(4):214-220. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy033.
The study was designed to characterize "on-label" use of i.v. diltiazem in patients with acute atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF).
An IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective, observational design was used. Eligible patients had acute AFF with heart rate >120 bpm and received i.v. diltiazem from June 1, 2012, to June 30, 2014. The primary outcome was frequency of on-label use of i.v. diltiazem, defined as use of at least one FDA-approved weight-based bolus dose followed by an infusion, if appropriate, in the absence of contraindications.
A total of 300 patients were screened; 97 patients were included for analysis. I.V. diltiazem was used on-label in only 14 patients (14%). Of the 96 patients who received an initial diltiazem bolus injection, the median dose was significantly higher in patients for whom the diltiazem dose was on-label, as follows: 17.5 mg (interquartile range [IQR]), 10-20 mg vs. 10.0 mg (IQR, 10-20 mg), p < 0.02). Twenty-nine patients (35%) in the off-label group had a therapeutic response to diltiazem alone compared with 8 patients (57%) in the on-label group (p = 0.11). More patients treated with off-label diltiazem bolus injection required additional rate control medications (41% vs. 7%, p < 0.04).
In most patients, i.v. diltiazem was not used in accordance with FDA labeling. For most, i.v. diltiazem doses were lower than recommended and many of these patients required additional rate control medications to achieve a therapeutic response.
本研究旨在描述静脉注射地尔硫䓬在急性心房颤动或心房扑动(AFF)患者中的“标签内”使用情况。
采用经机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性观察性设计。符合条件的患者为心率>120次/分钟的急性AFF患者,且在2012年6月1日至2014年6月30日期间接受了静脉注射地尔硫䓬治疗。主要结局是静脉注射地尔硫䓬的标签内使用频率,定义为在无禁忌证的情况下,使用至少一剂FDA批准的基于体重的推注剂量,随后酌情进行输注。
共筛查了300例患者;97例患者纳入分析。仅14例患者(14%)使用了标签内的静脉注射地尔硫䓬。在接受初始地尔硫䓬推注注射的96例患者中,地尔硫䓬剂量为标签内的患者的中位剂量显著更高,如下:17.5毫克(四分位间距[IQR]),10 - 20毫克,而其他患者为10.0毫克(IQR,10 - 20毫克),p < 0.02。非标签组中有29例患者(35%)仅对地尔硫䓬有治疗反应,而标签组中有8例患者(57%)(p = 0.11)。更多接受非标签地尔硫䓬推注注射治疗的患者需要额外的心率控制药物(41%对7%,p < 0.04)。
在大多数患者中,静脉注射地尔硫䓬未按照FDA标签使用。对于大多数患者,静脉注射地尔硫䓬剂量低于推荐剂量,且许多此类患者需要额外的心率控制药物以获得治疗反应。