• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单案例研究设计基础:当代应用与分析。

A Primer on Single-Case Research Designs: Contemporary Use and Analysis.

机构信息

Jennifer R. Ledford, Erin E. Barton, Katherine E. Severini, and Kathleen N. Zimmerman, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019 Jan;124(1):35-56. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-124.1.35.

DOI:10.1352/1944-7558-124.1.35
PMID:30715924
Abstract

The overarching purpose of this article is to provide an introduction to the use of rigorous single-case research designs (SCRDs) in special education and related fields. Authors first discuss basic design types and research questions that can be answered with SCRDs, examine threats to internal validity and potential ways to control for and detect common threats, and provide guidelines for selection of specific designs. Following, contemporary standards regarding rigor, measurement, description, and outcomes are presented. Then, authors discuss data analytic techniques, differentiating rigor, positive outcomes, functional relations, and magnitude of effects.

摘要

本文的主要目的是介绍严谨的单一案例研究设计(SCRD)在特殊教育和相关领域的应用。作者首先讨论了可以使用 SCRD 回答的基本设计类型和研究问题,考察了内部有效性的威胁以及控制和检测常见威胁的潜在方法,并提供了选择特定设计的指南。接下来,介绍了关于严谨性、测量、描述和结果的当代标准。然后,作者讨论了数据分析技术,区分了严谨性、积极结果、功能关系和效果大小。

相似文献

1
A Primer on Single-Case Research Designs: Contemporary Use and Analysis.单案例研究设计基础:当代应用与分析。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019 Jan;124(1):35-56. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-124.1.35.
2
Assessing threats to the validity of experimental and observational designs.评估实验设计和观察性设计有效性的威胁因素。
Fam Pract Res J. 1990 Winter;10(2):81-95.
3
Toward a standard assembly of linear graphs.迈向线性图的标准组装。
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Sep;33(3):350-355. doi: 10.1037/spq0000269. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
4
Threats to Internal Validity in Multiple-Baseline Design Variations.多基线设计变体中内部效度的威胁。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022 Jan 27;45(3):619-638. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00326-1. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
The design, conduct and report of single-case research: resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature.单病例研究的设计、实施与报告:提高神经康复文献质量的资源
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):315-31. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.875043. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
6
Appraisal of comparative single-case experimental designs for instructional interventions with non-reversible target behaviors: Introducing the CSCEDARS ("Cedars").教学干预措施针对不可逆转目标行为的比较单病例实验设计评价:引入 CSCEDARS(“雪松”)。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Aug;79:33-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.028. Epub 2018 May 28.
7
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.单病例实验设计:已发表研究和现行标准的系统评价。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):510-50. doi: 10.1037/a0029312. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
8
Concurrence on Nonconcurrence in Multiple-Baseline Designs: A Commentary on Slocum et al. (2022).对多基线设计中不同意见的共识:对斯洛克姆等人(2022年)的评论
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022 Jun 3;45(3):661-666. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00342-1. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Single-case experimental designs in medical education: an innovative research method.医学教育中的单病例实验设计:一种创新的研究方法。
Acad Med. 1996 Jan;71(1):78-85. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199601000-00021.
10
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.

引用本文的文献

1
Linking physical activity to workers' low back pain, back health, and theory-based psychological variables: study protocol of the workHealth intensive longitudinal observational study.将体力活动与工人的腰痛、背部健康以及基于理论的心理变量联系起来:工作健康强化纵向观察研究的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):995. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21873-7.
2
Zoom in screen with simultaneous prompting to teach young children with autism.放大屏幕并同时进行提示,以教导自闭症幼儿。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2023 Mar 22;70(8):1478-1489. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2023.2190988. eCollection 2024.
3
Approaches for Treating Multiply Controlled Problem Behavior.
治疗多重控制问题行为的方法。
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Sep 21;17(1):53-69. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00858-1. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Type I error rates and power of two randomization test procedures for the changing criterion design.Ⅰ型错误率和两种随机化检验程序的功效,用于变化标准设计。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3637-3657. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02303-1. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
5
Testing delayed, gradual, and temporary treatment effects in randomized single-case experiments: A general response function framework.在随机单案例实验中测试延迟、渐进和临时的治疗效果:一般响应函数框架。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3915-3936. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02230-1. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
Does the choice of a linear trend-assessment technique matter in the context of single-case data?线性趋势评估技术的选择在单病例数据中重要吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):4200-4221. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02013-0. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
7
Defining and assessing immediacy in single-case experimental designs.定义和评估单病例实验设计中的即时性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Nov;118(3):462-492. doi: 10.1002/jeab.799. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
A Randomized Controlled Trial for Audiovisual Multisensory Perception in Autistic Youth.自闭症青年视听多感官知觉的随机对照试验。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Nov;53(11):4318-4335. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05709-6. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
9
Waiting for baseline stability in single-case designs: Is it worth the time and effort?等待单案例设计中的基线稳定:是否值得花费时间和精力?
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):843-854. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01858-9. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
A proposal for the assessment of replication of effects in single-case experimental designs.关于评估单病例实验设计中效应复制的建议。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Jun;55(3):997-1024. doi: 10.1002/jaba.923. Epub 2022 Apr 25.