• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于质量评价标准评估阿斯巴甜致癌流行病学研究。

Evaluation of aspartame cancer epidemiology studies based on quality appraisal criteria.

机构信息

Intertek Regulatory & Scientific Consultancy, 2233 Argentia Rd., Suite 201, Mississauga, ON, L5N 2X7, Canada.

Intertek Regulatory & Scientific Consultancy, 2233 Argentia Rd., Suite 201, Mississauga, ON, L5N 2X7, Canada.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.033
PMID:30716379
Abstract

Given the widespread use of the low-calorie sweetener aspartame over the last 30 years, the current work was undertaken to evaluate aspartame epidemiology studies looking at cancer endpoints against quality appraisal criteria. The quality appraisal tool used was from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institute of Health. Studies identified included nine case-control studies and five prospective cohort studies. Most studies assessed low-calorie or diet beverages rather than aspartame intake specifically; however, common use of aspartame in diet sodas does allow for some general extrapolation of results. Following consideration of study quality, two case-control and five prospective studies were considered to meet the majority of the NHLBI criteria. The primary limitation of the other case-control studies was an inadequate sample size. Overall, the results of the studies do not support that exposures to low and no-calorie sweeteners and beverages, and by extension aspartame, are associated with an increased risk of cancer in humans.

摘要

鉴于低卡路里甜味剂阿斯巴甜在过去 30 年中的广泛使用,目前开展了这项工作,以根据质量评估标准评估针对癌症终点的阿斯巴甜流行病学研究。使用的质量评估工具来自美国国立卫生研究院的国家心肺血液研究所 (NHLBI)。确定的研究包括九项病例对照研究和五项前瞻性队列研究。大多数研究评估的是低卡路里或饮食饮料,而不是专门评估阿斯巴甜的摄入量;然而,阿斯巴甜在无糖苏打水中的普遍使用确实允许对结果进行一些一般性推断。在考虑了研究质量之后,有两项病例对照研究和五项前瞻性研究被认为符合 NHLBI 的大多数标准。其他病例对照研究的主要局限性是样本量不足。总体而言,这些研究的结果并不支持低卡路里和无卡路里甜味剂和饮料(以及由此推断的阿斯巴甜)暴露与人类癌症风险增加之间存在关联。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of aspartame cancer epidemiology studies based on quality appraisal criteria.基于质量评价标准评估阿斯巴甜致癌流行病学研究。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
2
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study.人工甜味剂与癌症风险:基于 NutriNet-Santé 人群队列研究的结果。
PLoS Med. 2022 Mar 24;19(3):e1003950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003950. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Aspartame, low-calorie sweeteners and disease: regulatory safety and epidemiological issues.阿斯巴甜、低热量甜味剂与疾病:监管安全与流行病学问题。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Oct;60:109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.040. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
4
No Association between Low-Calorie Sweetener (LCS) Use and Overall Cancer Risk in the Nationally Representative Database in the US: Analyses of NHANES 1988-2018 Data and 2019 Public-Use Linked Mortality Files.在美国全国代表性数据库中,低卡路里甜味剂(LCS)的使用与总体癌症风险之间没有关联:对 NHANES 1988-2018 年数据和 2019 年公共使用链接死亡率文件的分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 22;14(23):4957. doi: 10.3390/nu14234957.
5
Effects of aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia- and sucrose-sweetened beverages on postprandial glucose, insulin and energy intake.阿斯巴甜、罗汉果、甜菊糖苷和蔗糖甜味饮料对餐后血糖、胰岛素和能量摄入的影响。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Mar;41(3):450-457. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.225. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
6
Consumption of aspartame-containing beverages and incidence of hematopoietic and brain malignancies.含阿斯巴甜饮料的消费与造血及脑部恶性肿瘤的发病率
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Sep;15(9):1654-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0203.
7
Daily Early-Life Exposures to Diet Soda and Aspartame Are Associated with Autism in Males: A Case-Control Study.每日早期生活中接触低热量饮料和阿斯巴甜与男性自闭症有关:病例对照研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 29;15(17):3772. doi: 10.3390/nu15173772.
8
Artificial sweeteners: safe or unsafe?人工甜味剂:安全还是不安全?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Feb;65(2):225-7.
9
Aspartame bioassay findings portend human cancer hazards.阿斯巴甜生物测定结果预示着对人类的癌症危害。
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2007 Oct-Dec;13(4):446-8. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2007.13.4.446.
10
Aspartame and cancer - new evidence for causation.阿斯巴甜与癌症——新的因果证据。
Environ Health. 2021 Apr 12;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00725-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) on Children's Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)对儿童健康相关生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Atten Disord. 2023 Apr;27(6):598-611. doi: 10.1177/10870547231155438. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
High Concentrations of Aspartame Induce Pro-Angiogenic Effects in Ovo and Cytotoxic Effects in HT-29 Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cells.高浓度阿斯巴甜在鸡胚中诱导促血管生成作用,并对 HT-29 人结肠癌细胞产生细胞毒性作用。
Nutrients. 2020 Nov 24;12(12):3600. doi: 10.3390/nu12123600.
3
Dietary Additives and Supplements Revisited: The Fewer, the Safer for Liver and Gut Health.
再谈膳食添加剂与补充剂:越少,对肝脏和肠道健康越安全。
Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2019;5(4):303-316. doi: 10.1007/s40495-019-00187-4. Epub 2019 Jun 10.