[The combined interpretation schemes including VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and Rta-IgG in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

To compare the performances of VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and Rta-IgG in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and find the most appropriate combined interpretation scheme. The current study included a total of 346 subjects. Ninety-six subjects were nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases which were pathologically verified by the biopsy under electronic laryngoscope. The remaining 250 subjects, who received EBV tests at the same period, were normal healthy individuals without nasopharyngeal carcinoma. VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and Rta-IgG were detected in all cases. The clinial data were analyzed retrospectively. Best cutoff points of VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and Rta-IgG in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were 1.37 s/co, 0.706 s/co and 0.817 s/co; the sensitivities were 88.5%,49.0% and 65.6%; the specificities were 88.8%,96.0% and 95.2%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of VCA-IgA was significantly higher than that of EA-IgA and Rta-IgG (<0.05). Three combined interpretation schemes were developed based on the VCA-IgA: ①VCA-IgA+EA-IgA; ②VCA-IgA+Rta-IgG; ③VCA-IgA+EA-IgA+Rta-IgG. Compared to the VCA-IgA, all the combined interpretation schemes had increased sensitivities and decreased specificities. The scheme 3 had the highest sensitivity. And the scheme 2 had the highest Youden index, and a comparable diagnosis accuracy to that of VCA-IgA (>0.05). VCA-IgA, EA-IgA and Rta-IgG were all helpful indicators in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. VCA-IgA was more accurate than the EA-IgA and Rta-IgG. Combined interpretation schemes were helpful in improving the sensitivity. Because the clinical symptoms of nasopharyngeal carcinoma are often insidious and the missed diagnosis by serological examination may lead to serious consequences. It is of clinical value to adopt the combined interpretation schemes to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.