Brandt Silvia, Winter Anna, Lauer Hans-Christoph, Kollmar Fritz, Portscher-Kim Soo-Jeong, Romanos Georgios E
Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry, Oral Medicine, Julius Maximilian University, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
Materials (Basel). 2019 Feb 2;12(3):462. doi: 10.3390/ma12030462.
The IPS e.max system by Ivoclar Vivadent, offering a variety of products and indications, is widely used for all-ceramic restorations. We analyzed the clinical track record of these products in daily clinical practice, associating their restorative survival rate with various parameters to define recommendations for long-term stability. A total of 1058 full-coverage crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPDs) were evaluated retrospectively over up to 66.48 (37.05 ± 18.4) months. All were made of IPS e.max Press, IPS e.max CAD, IPS e.max Ceram or IPS e.max ZirPress and had been delivered by a private dental practice within three years. Uses not recommended by the manufacturer were also deliberately included. The five-year cumulative survival was 94.22% (i.e., 94.69% or 90.58% for glass-ceramic crowns or FDPs and 100% or 90.06% for zirconia-based crowns or FDPs). Significantly superior outcomes emerged for conventional vs. adhesive cementation and for vital vs. non-vital abutment teeth, but not for recommended vs. non-recommended uses. Caution is required in restoring non-vital teeth, but the spectrum of recommended uses should generally be reconsidered and expanded, given our finding of high survival and success rates for IPS e.max ceramics, even for uses not currently recommended by the manufacturer.
义获嘉伟瓦登特公司的IPS e.max系统提供多种产品及适应证,广泛应用于全瓷修复。我们分析了这些产品在日常临床实践中的临床记录,将其修复体生存率与各种参数相关联,以确定长期稳定性的建议。对1058个全冠和固定局部义齿(FPD)进行了回顾性评估,时间长达66.48(37.05±18.4)个月。所有修复体均由IPS e.max Press、IPS e.max CAD、IPS e.max Ceram或IPS e.max ZirPress制成,且均在三年内由一家私人牙科诊所交付。还特意纳入了制造商不推荐的用途。五年累积生存率为94.22%(即玻璃陶瓷全冠或FDP为94.69%或90.58%,氧化锆基全冠或FDP为100%或90.06%)。传统粘结与粘结剂粘结以及活髓基牙与无髓基牙相比,疗效显著更好,但推荐用途与非推荐用途之间无显著差异。修复无髓牙时需要谨慎,但鉴于我们发现IPS e.max陶瓷即使在制造商目前不推荐的用途中也具有高生存率和成功率,一般应重新考虑并扩大推荐用途的范围。