关于：宫颈癌的微创与腹式根治性子宫切除术 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Re: Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.

作者信息

Ohlmann Carsten-Henning, Hadaschik Boris

机构信息

Malteser Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):875. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.029

PMID:30718007

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Re: Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.关于：宫颈癌的微创与腹式根治性子宫切除术

Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):875. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的疗效比较。

Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.031. Epub 2012 Jun 24.

Minimally Invasive or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.宫颈癌的微创或腹部根治性子宫切除术

N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 21;380(8):793. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1816590.

Minimally Invasive or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.宫颈癌的微创或腹部根治性子宫切除术

N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 21;380(8):793-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1816590.

Minimally Invasive or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.宫颈癌的微创或腹式根治性子宫切除术

N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 21;380(8):794. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1816590.

Minimally Invasive or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. Reply.宫颈癌的微创或腹部根治性子宫切除术。回复。

N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 21;380(8):794-795. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1816590.

Re: "Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study".关于：“腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的配对对照研究”。

Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Sep;98(3):521-2; author reply 522-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.03.005.

Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy: the first report of LESS type III hysterectomy involves a woman with cervical cancer.经阴道单孔腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术：首例 LESS Ⅲ型宫颈癌根治术报告

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;207(6):518.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.868. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

[Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomies in the surgical treatment of cervical cancer].[腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术在宫颈癌手术治疗中的比较]

Orv Hetil. 2017 Sep;158(36):1403-1409. doi: 10.1556/650.2017.30828.

Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.保留神经的微型腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术加系统性盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较（用于宫颈癌患者）

Surg Innov. 2013 Oct;20(5):493-501. doi: 10.1177/1553350612472986. Epub 2013 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.基于国际妇产科联盟（FIGO）2018年新分期系统比较机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的肿瘤学结局：一项多中心回顾性研究

Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 30;12:879569. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.879569. eCollection 2022.

Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in a Single Tertiary Care Institution from Lithuania between 2009 and 2019.2009 年至 2019 年期间，立陶宛某单一三级保健机构中腹腔镜与开腹广泛子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的回顾性比较。

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 17;58(4):553. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040553.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验