Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK.
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QW, UK.
J Environ Radioact. 2020 Jan;211:105893. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
In the initial aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl accident there were detrimental effects recorded on wildlife, including, mass mortality of pine trees close to the reactor, reduced pine seed production, reductions in soil invertebrate abundance and diversity and likely death of small mammals. More than 30 years after the Chernobyl accident there is no consensus on the longer-term impact of the chronic exposure to radiation on wildlife in what is now referred to as the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. Reconciling this lack of consensus is one of the main challenges for radioecology. With the inclusion of environmental protection in, for instance, the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), we need to be able to incorporate knowledge of the potential effects of radiation on wildlife within the regulatory process (e.g. as a basis on which to define benchmark dose rates). In this paper, we use examples of reported effects on different wildlife groups inhabiting the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) as a framework to discuss potential reasons for the lack of consensus, consider important factors influencing dose rates organisms receive and make some recommendations on good practice.
在 1986 年切尔诺贝利事故的最初余波中,野生动物受到了不利影响,包括反应堆附近的松树大量死亡、松树种子产量减少、土壤无脊椎动物数量和多样性减少,以及小型哺乳动物可能死亡。切尔诺贝利事故发生 30 多年后,对于如今被称为切尔诺贝利禁区的地区内,野生动物长期慢性辐射暴露的影响,仍没有达成共识。协调这种缺乏共识是辐射生态学的主要挑战之一。例如,将环境保护纳入国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)的建议中,我们需要能够将辐射对野生动物潜在影响的知识纳入监管过程中(例如,作为定义基准剂量率的基础)。在本文中,我们使用报告的在切尔诺贝利禁区(CEZ)栖息的不同野生动物群体的影响示例作为框架,讨论缺乏共识的潜在原因,考虑影响生物体接受剂量的重要因素,并就良好实践提出一些建议。